Blog

 
     

California Governor Vetoes Legislative Bills

By Michael Klazema on 11/4/2015

California Governor Brown vetoed two legislative bills last week that would have limited information available to employers and impacted the hiring process. With the Governor’s veto of Assembly bills 676 and 1017, employers will continue to have access to applicants’ employment status and salary history information.

Assembly Bill 676 would have made it a discriminatory action to seek an applicant’s employment status before determining that the individual meets the minimum employment qualifications for the position. It also would have prohibited employers from publishing any advertisements or announcements stating that an unemployed person is ineligible for the job. In vetoing the bill, the Governor stated that the proposed law did not provide a proper or effective path to get unemployed people back to work. He vetoed a similar bill last year.

Assembly Bill 1017 would have prohibited employers from seeking salary history information, including compensation and benefits, about applicants for employment. The Governor cited the California Fair Pay Act (Senate Bill 358) that he signed earlier this month in his reason for vetoing AB 1017. The California Fair Pay Act requires that women be paid equally for work that is substantially similar to the work of their male colleagues. The Governor said Assembly bill 1017 broadly prohibits employers from obtaining relevant information with little evidence that it would assure more equitable wages. He wants to give the Fair Pay Act a chance to work before making further changes.

What This Means To You:

  • California Governor Brown vetoed Assembly bills 676 and 1017.
  • Employers will continue to have access to applicants’ employment status and salary history information when making employment decisions.
  • Disregard any notice stating these bills have passed and that employers are prohibited from seeking the employment status or salary history of applicants in California.

Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • December 04 Chicago Public Schools has dismissed hundreds of employees, coaches, vendors, and volunteers based on background check findings. The district recently vowed to re-check the majority of its 68,000 employees after a Chicago Tribune investigation revealed holes in its background check policies.
  • November 29 Striving to create a safer environment more conducive to productive training and leadership development, the Army has recently moved to adopt a uniform policy of background checks for certain roles. 
  • November 27 California’s biggest public school district is waiving the cost of volunteer background checks. The move is meant to encourage more family - and community members to get involved with the school district.
  • November 22 Contractors play an important role in the workforce, delivering services to both individuals and organizations. Vetting contractors for suitability continues to be a challenge, as two recent articles prove.
  • November 21 When it comes to background and pre-employment checks, it can be instructive to look at the characteristics of the ten most massive U.S. employers.
  • November 20 The #MeToo movement is bringing about legislative changes employers need to know about. We review some of the laws recently passed in California.
  • November 19

    Will a criminal conviction show up on your background check forever? In most states, there is a year limit for how long background check companies can report older criminal information.


  • November 15

    Replacing an inconsistent array of procedures, Ontario's government has passed into law a reform act intended to clarify how police departments should handle requests for information to be used in background checks. 


  • November 14 The federal government has vowed to cut its backlog of security clearance background checks in half by spring. Currently, the backlog is approximately 600,000 names strong.
  • November 12 To ensure the best hires, DFWSPF has implemented a stringent employee screening process—one that includes background searches through backgroundchecks.com.