Office of Personnel Management Still Working on Informing People Whether or Not They Were Exposed in Major Background Check Breach

By Michael Klazema on 12/7/2015

The government is still working on notifying people whose personal information was compromised in a massive Office of Personnel Management data breach. The OPM announced the breach back in June of this year, noting that hackers had targeted background check records archived by the office. (The OPM is in charge of running background investigations of government personnel.) All told, a reported 21.5 million peopled were affected by the breach in some regard. 19.7 million of them were individuals who had applied for background checks through the OPM since 2000. The others were spouses or family members whose personal information had been requested on the OPM forms.

The scope of the breach, which led to the exposure of Social Security Numbers, dates and places of birth, current addresses, fingerprints, and more, has already been a major controversy for the OPM and the government in general. In the wake of the hack, OPM Director Katherine Archuleta resigned from her post, following calls from lawmakers to do so. The OPM has also been criticized for not properly encrypting and securing its data, especially sensitive information regarding government personnel or former employees and applicants.

Now, the controversy is bound to explode yet again. On October 1st, Acting OPM Director Beth Cobert published a blog post stating that the agency would notify, via U.S. Postal Service, those whose information had been stolen or compromised in the cyber-attack. Fast-forward more than two months later, though, and the government has still not finished the process of notifying all of the people who had their information compromised in the June breach. Granted, sending notifications, via mail, to 21 million people is a daunting task. Still, people have a right to know whether or not their information was stolen, and the OPM hasn't shown sufficient hustle in getting the job done here.

According to the Washington Post, the government also isn't sure how to verify that people have actually received their notifications. Part of the problem of using the Postal Service for this job is that the OPM has outdated addresses for a lot of the past government employees or unhired applicants who were affected by the breach. Other notifications, the Washington Post article says, may have gotten lost in the mail.

Luckily, there's a new way for people to determine whether or not their background check information with the OPM was exposed in the hack. On Tuesday, December 1st, the government introduced a website where past and present government personnel, spouses, and one-time applicants can go to check their status. By entering their names, addresses, and several other pieces of information (including, somewhat ironically, their Social Security Numbers), people can get immediate answers as to whether or not they were among the 21.5 million people compromised in the breach. 


Industry News

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 22 Countrywide, states and local municipalities have committed to ban the box legislation, seeking to equalize opportunities in the job market for those with criminal histories.
  • March 22

    Thinking about becoming a firefighter? Here are some of the background check requirements you might face.

  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants.