Are the Student Worker Requirements in the California State University System Too Steep?

By Michael Klazema on 11/27/2015

Are the background checks and the other requirements that student workers face in the California State University system too steep for such young workers? Currently, there's a bit of a divide on campus about the subject, with some faculty members and student organizations insisting that the requirements aren't fair for student workers. As of yet, though, no official proposal has been launched with university administrators to change the policy.

Under current employment requirements as stipulated by the California State University system, student workers and volunteers must undergo background checks "if they perform duties that would require the checks if performed by CSU employees." More often than not, that rule means that the university is vetting student employees to the same standards that are required of faculty members and other employees. Graduate assistants who assist with course grading and have access to student information, for instance, are required to pass background checks.In addition to the background checks, students applying for jobs through their university are also required to provide a minimum of three references.

Overall, it seems like CSU is being completely fair with its background check policies. Sure, the California university system might be a bit more vigilant about screening student workers than the average higher education institution. However, the system is also very transparent about their background check policies. The policies are all laid out on the CSU San Bernardino website, which says that the checks are important for "protecting the health, well-being, and safety of employees, students, volunteers, and guests." The same page includes guarantees that CSU will protect the individual privacy of those who are required to face background checks, as well as disclaimers that said background checks will not lead to discrimination.

Still, some students and faculty members are reportedly not pleased with the student worker policies that the California State University system is observing. According to an article in The Daily Aztec, the student newspaper at San Diego State University, one of the 23 campuses in the CSU system, two student organizations recently met to discuss the policies.

The meeting in question combined the College Life Council and the University Council and featured a visit from a professor who opposes running background checks on student workers. The councils discussed the CSU student worker policies, taking issue in particular with the three reference requirements, which might not be "fair" for students who have maybe only held one job previously. The background checks, meanwhile, were deemed problematic for their cost and how long they tend to take.

The College Life Council and the University Council, known together as "Associated Students", could potentially take their concerns about student worker screening policies to the CSU Board of Trustees for additional consideration. However, the fact that the university system is doing its due diligence in running background checks based on job responsibilities and not age or enrollment status makes it unlikely that things will change drastically in the CSU system.


Industry News

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.