New Mexico School District Adds Instant Volunteer Checks

By Michael Klazema on 1/26/2016

Going forward, all volunteers at Rio Rancho Public Schools in Rio Rancho, New Mexico will have to undergo background checks—though, not necessarily the traditional kind that many of us are familiar with. On the contrary, instead of giving their names, fingerprints, or other identifying details to the school district for a background investigation, volunteers will instead be subject to "instant" background checks upon their arrivals at Rio Rancho school buildings.

The system being implemented at Rio Rancho Public Schools is similar to the other "flash background check" systems that some school districts across the country have put in place to screen school volunteers and visitors. Essentially, a parent or community member looking to volunteer will come to a school and go directly to the main office. There, the volunteer would check in with the school, a process that would include a "mini-background check" that would search for prior convictions of sexual abuse. Each school office will be granted access to an online database to perform the background checks.

If and when a volunteer passes the background check, the office would print a badge or sticker out for that person, more or less providing clearance for them to be in the school building. Once that person's business in the school was concluded, they would be required to stop back at the office to "sign out," which would constitute giving back the sticker or badge they were given at the beginning of their visit. The school destroys the old badges, and regular volunteers are required to return to the office and go through the process again upon every school visit.

In the past, Rio Rancho Public Schools would just run upfront background checks on anyone interested in volunteering. So long as a person passed their background check, they would then have two years of clearance to serve a volunteer capacity within the school district. The main goal of this flash background check system is to ensure that every volunteer has to renew his or her school clearance with each new visit.

Some parents in the Rio Rancho community are worried that this repetitious background check and clearance system might serve as a barrier to parents hoping to volunteer at school—not because those parents would fail the background checks, but because the system is inconvenient. A parent who volunteers multiple times in a week, or even in multiple class hours throughout a single day, would still have to go through the clearance process every time they re-enter a school building. While the process is supposedly quite quick, there is probably a point where it would become irritating or even start to seem disrespectful.

However, the system would do a good job of tracking which volunteers are in the school building at any given time, and would ensure that none of those volunteers were a threat to students. The benefits, in other words, outweigh the annoyances and disadvantages.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.