Blog

 
     

Audit Looks at Background Checks for Long-Term Care Providers

By Michael Klazema on 2/10/2016

For those who were wondering about the importance of background checks for long-term senior care, the United States Department of Health and Human Services recently released a new study that answers the question. The report, which was compiled by the Office of Inspector General, looked at statistics for background checks on long-term care providers in six areas—five states and the District of Columbia. Specifically, the study looked to track the percentage of long-term care applicants who were disqualified from employment consideration due to background check findings.

Based on the Inspector General’s report, 2.9% of all applicants across the six territories were denied long-term care employment because of their backgrounds. The worst offender, in terms of percentages, was Alaska, where 4% of applicants were disqualified from consideration. Also included in the survey were Florida (3.3%), Michigan (1.1%), New Mexico (1.1%), Washington D.C. (1%), and Oklahoma (0.4%). In total, the survey tracked 1,046,121 background checks, of which 30,025 people were deemed ineligible for employment.

While Alaska had the worst average, Florida actually had the most damning statistics in terms of sheer numbers. A popular retirement destination, Florida was the state where the Inspector General recorded the most background checks: 787,683, to be exact. Of those, more than 26,000 people were deemed ineligible to serve as long-term care providers. In another state without a senior care background check requirement, all 26,000 of those people might have been permitted to work with seniors—a sobering statistic, to be sure.

As the Inspector General report noted, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (more commonly known as Obamacare) promises grants to the states that "implement background check programs for prospective long-term-care employees." The six states reviewed in this report were the ones to take the government up on that offer. As a stipulation of the Obamacare grants, the states were required to open their records to an investigation from the Office of the Inspector General. The report chronicles the investigation, which looked at the first four years of the program from September 2010 to September 2014.

The survey showed two things. First of all, the implementation of background check policies for long-term care workers hasn't exactly gone off without a hitch. Most states were, for one reason or another, unable to report data about their background checks. The report included details about these failutres, which will hopefully help states to improve their policies and ensure better data reporting going forward.

The second trend displayed by the survey is that, when done right, background checks for long-term care providers are extremely important. Recently, we've seen a lot of national headlines about caregivers who were arrested, charged, and convicted of abusing their positions. From embezzlement of bank accounts to abuse and neglect, caregivers are in a position to take advantage of their patients if they wish to do so. Since many elderly patients are vulnerable due to low mobility, mental decline, or overall physical frailty, they are often the targets of con artists and other unsavory people. As Florida and Alaska's statistics show, it's important to have background checks in place to filter some of these potentially dangerous individuals out of the caregiver pool.

Read the full Office of Inspector General report here.

Source: http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-07-10-00420.pdf

 


Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • June 20 Repeat background checks are becoming more common, with companies in India leading the charge. What does this trend look like, and how can employers embrace it now to stay ahead of the curve?
  • June 19

    Every federal job involves a background check of some kind. These background checks and how they are evaluated vary based on job, department, and security clearance level.


  • June 18

  • June 14 Ban the box laws aim to improve opportunities for employment. Could they have the opposite effect instead?
  • June 13 Jacobs Petroleum Products is a regional petroleum company that operates throughout Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Maryland. Apart from their employees carrying much responsibility and have frequent contact with customers, the company’s hiring also tends to be segmented since individual store managers are responsible for hiring talent for their own stores. In this employment landscape, Jacobs Petroleum Products needed a reliable and effective way to screen its new hires for criminal infractions and other red flags.
  • June 12

    The University of Wisconsin System may tweak its hiring and reference check processes. The potential changes come after one of UW’s assistant deans was accused of sexual harassment.


  • June 07 Stories of abuse by coaches in youth sports leagues continue to crop up around the country, but rules and guidelines remain patchy and enforcement is often lacking. The struggle to implement an effective system continues nationwide.
  • June 07 Financial background checks, usually referred to as credit history checks, can be an effective way to find out if a candidate is fit to handle accounts, financial data, and other assets at your business.
  • June 06 The Society for Human Resource Management and the Charles Koch Institute recently commissioned a survey to find out how willing employers were to hire people with criminal records. The study indicates that managers, HR professionals, and employees themselves are becoming more comfortable with the idea of hiring and working with ex-offenders.
  • June 04 Are fingerprint background checks the gold standard for employee screening, or are they overhyped? We look at some of the myths and misconceptions surrounding these checks.