Indiana's Teacher Background Checks Face Damning Report

By Michael Klazema on 3/2/2016

Indiana parents may be feeling a bit wary about sending their kids to school, following a damning report on the state's teacher background check policies in the Chicago Tribune. The renowned newspaper covered several cases where teachers or tutors throughout Indiana hurt or violated students—despite red flags in their backgrounds that should have prevented employment.

One example was a man who pushed a special education student down the stairs and then hit a witness to the offense. Another was a man who is facing aggravated sexual assault charges against a nine-year-old girl he was tutoring. Both individuals had horrific criminal convictions on their records. The former had spent two years in prison for dogfighting and other gross animal cruelty charges. The latter had convictions for misdemeanor battery and inappropriately touching students. Both men were able to get teacher's licenses through the Indiana Department of Education.

Cases like these, as the Tribune article notes, could explain why Indiana recently received an "F" grade in USA Today's nationwide report about teacher background check policies. The latter individual—the convicted child molester—faced his convictions and served time in Illinois. The former teacher, though—the one convicted of dogfighting and animal cruelty—served his prison time in Indiana.

Indiana failed the USA Today examination based largely on the fact that the Indiana Department of Education doesn't require any background checks for individuals seeking licensure. Instead, the background checks are left up to the school districts themselves. Clearly, not all of those districts are digging deep enough to find criminal history—both inside and outside of the state. Indiana itself provides virtually no support to help schools identify teachers who might pose threats to children. Even once teachers are accused of or charged with misconduct, the state has no laws that demand the reporting of that information.

In a perfect world, school districts around the country would report all teacher disciplinary cases to NASDTEC, the national clearinghouse that tracks such information. Schools would then be able to access NASDTEC and run an additional background check on each new hire, to determine if a teacher had ever had issues with misconduct at other schools. Since not all disciplinary actions within school districts result in criminal charges or convictions, the NASDTEC system would allow districts to see the red flags that don't make it into the criminal record.

Unfortunately, the Tribune article says that "there's not much appetite in the Indiana General Assembly" to change the laws and make teacher background checks a state responsibility. The report quoted a State Representative who said that all legislature on this particular subject "never seems to go anywhere." There is a possibility that the high profile and none-too-flattering press from the USA Today and now the Chicago Tribune could put new pressure on Indiana politicians. For now, though, the state remains a state with a flawed system.


Industry News

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.