Tennessee Ban the Box Bill Is Nearly Law

By Michael Klazema on 3/22/2016
From the looks of it, Tennessee will soon add its name to the list of states that bans the box for public employers. A bill to remove questions pertaining to criminal history from all state job applications recently passed a vote in the Tennessee Senate. Now, the bill is on its way to the desk of Governor Bill Haslam for a final signature of approval.

So long as Governor Haslam signs the legislation—and there is no reason to believe that he won't—Tennessee will become the 22nd state in the country to ban the box for public employers. According to the National Employment Law Project, seven of those 22 states—Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, Oregon, and Rhode Island—have gone one step further with the Fair Chance Employment movement, banning the box for private employers as well as public employers.

Tennessee isn't quite to that place yet, but the state's ban the box legislation will make sure that nearly half of the country has Fair Chance Employment laws on the books. In addition to statewide ban the box laws, Washington D.C. and dozens of cities, counties, and municipalities across the country have also taken steps to remove the criminal history question from job applications. Several areas throughout Tennessee are a part of that list, including Nashville, Memphis, Chattanooga, and Hamilton County. All four localities had previously banned the box for public employers. No cities or counties in Tennessee have yet banned the box for private employers.

According to the Memphis Business Journal, though, Tennessee could also soon become the eighth state to ban the box for private employers. The newspaper reported that as the public ban the box bill heads to the governor, a companion bill that would change private hiring practices has also passed the State Senate.

The same article noted that between 1980 and 2008, the rate of incarceration in the United States quadrupled. That statistic underlines the perceived need for ban the box legislation, which helps eliminate some of the stigma that ex-offenders carry with them in their job searches.

As usual, Tennessee's laws would allow employers to run background checks. However, by postponing conversations about criminal history to later in the employment screening process, the legislation would aim to give one-time criminal offenders a better chance to prove themselves as quality hires.

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.