St. Louis Assessor's Office Worker Charged with Embezzlement

By Michael Klazema on 3/18/2016

A woman who worked for the St. Louis Assessor's Office has been charged with embezzling money from city homeowners, according to a recent report from the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. The employee in question was not required to undergo a background check prior to starting her job—a fact that could encourage a policy overhaul within the Assessor's Office. The woman is facing three felony charges and one misdemeanor charge for her crimes.

The Assessor's Office employee was identified as a "clerk typist"—a low-level position that did not directly involve access to city accounts or other monetary responsibilities. Because the position doesn't involve the handling of money, the city does not require candidates to pass background checks as a condition of employment. However, such logic is arguably flawed, given the fact that the employee did have the task of processing property tax refunds for city residents. In other words, her job did involve money—just not in a traditional way that meant access to or control of city accounts.

It was in the processing of tax refunds that the Assessor's Office employee committed her numerous counts of embezzlement. The St. Louis Post-Dispatch report notes that, on four occasions, the woman forged tax refund requests for property owners throughout the city. She then tampered with the information for these individuals in the city computer system. The result? The fraudulent refund checks were sent to her friends, rather than to the property owners themselves. Police say that the woman would then meet up with her friends to collect the money from the fraudulent tax refunds.

The Assessor's Office employee was caught when someone in another government office—the St. Louis Collector of Revenue—noticed that they had processed two refund checks to the same address. When the suspect was ultimately fired from the Assessor's Office on December 14th, she had embezzled tax refunds from four different people in the space of a month. Police say the total dollar value of the embezzlement was $2,400. Three of the occurrences involved embezzlement of more than $500—the line for a felony charge—while one was still in the misdemeanor range.

If the Assessor's Office had done a thorough background check, they might have discovered a 2001 conviction for "fraudulent use of a credit device." That finding might have barred her from working for the government office, and certainly would have resulted in a reduction in privileges. According to the Post-Dispatch article, the Assessor's Office doesn't customarily give the computer privileges the woman had to anyone not in a supervisory position. Due to criticisms of customer service in the tax refund process, though, the office decided to use lower-level employees to sponsor the requests. Unfortunately, they didn't revise their background check policy to go along with the heightened responsibilities.

Right now, officials from the Assessor's Office say they have reconsidered their decision to give non-supervisors high-level privileges in the computer system. That course of action is one way to avoid incidents like this in the future, but being more thorough about background checks might be the better choice. Since employees in government offices often have access to files about local residents, vetting those employees more thoroughly would do a lot to increase security and reduce abuse of privileges.



Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 22 Countrywide, states and local municipalities have committed to ban the box legislation, seeking to equalize opportunities in the job market for those with criminal histories.
  • March 22

    Thinking about becoming a firefighter? Here are some of the background check requirements you might face.

  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants.