Binghamton, New York Considering Property Background Checks

By Michael Klazema on 3/28/2016

It's not uncommon to hear about mandatory background check requirements for certain jobs, like teachers or doctors. Usually, though, in the areas of real estate and property rental, background checks are more up to the individual landlord or realtor. In Binghamton, New York, though, landlords could soon have no choice in whether or not to running background checks on prospective tenants. According to a report from Binghamton-based newspaper Press& Sun-Bulletin, the Binghamton City Council is considering a local law that would mandate background checks for all tenants or residents of the city.

The legislation is called the Neighborhood Protection Integrity Act and basically makes due diligence a matter of law for realtors and landlords in Binghamton. By requiring those renting or selling property to screen potential tenants or buyers, the city of Binghamton would be looking to keep potentially dangerous individuals—like sex offenders or violent criminals—from setting down roots in the area.

The councilman who proposed the legislation did so based on the rising crime levels in Binghamton, as well as what he perceived as a decline in the aesthetics of the properties in the city. Presumably, this background check requirement would help cut down on crime while also returning a friendlier look and feel to the area. 

The Binghamton City Council will convene a committee to discuss and potentially revise the Neighborhood Protection Integrity Act later this month. Unsurprisingly, though, the legislation doesn't have the complete support of all council members—not yet, anyway. At least one councilman was worried that requiring landlords might not be entirely legal. Other members argued that, while law forbids landlords and realtors from using factors like race, color, or sexual orientation, there is no explicit language barring property owners from using criminal records to make decisions about who to rent or sell to.

Still, even if outright illegality isn't an issue, a background check requirement like this will probably garner criticism from champions of civil liberties. It could be argued, for example, that a policy like this would have a disparate impact on African American communities. Since African American males are typically more likely to have criminal records than other groups, a policy that makes it more difficult for those individuals to find housing in Binghamton could be viewed as discriminatory based on race.

Then again, the Neighborhood Protection Integrity Act does not include language prohibiting landlords from renting property to individuals with criminal history. Rather, it would just require background checks to take place, with the goal of giving landlords and realtors more knowledge of who they are dealing with. It would then be up to the landlord or realtor to decide whether or not the tenant or buyer in question would pose a threat to the surrounding community.


Industry News

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.