Blog

 
     

Arizona Wants Background Checks for Certain Journalists

By Michael Klazema on 4/12/2016

In an interesting development, leaders within the Arizona House of Representatives are going to start requiring background checks for journalists that cover the House. According to Sputnik News there is a reason for the background checks: traditionally, journalists covering House of Representatives matters aren’t just writing about the political body from afar. Rather, journalists in these positions receive key cards that give them free, unfettered access to the House floor. Apparently, these reporters can even access House facilities when the House of Representatives isn't in session. Or, at least, they could.

Based on the Sputnik News report, the Arizona House of Representatives is done giving journalists favored treatment. Going forward, any journalist hoping to interview state lawmakers about pending legislation or House votes will have to pass a criminal background checks to gain access to the floor. Any reporter who has been convicted of a felony in the past decade or a misdemeanor in the last five years will be "barred" from accessing the House floor. Reporters who fail their background checks or refuse to undergo the screening process will be asked to sit in the gallery instead.

It isn't just small-time newspapers or bloggers who could end up barred from the House floor, either. On the contrary, the new background check requirements will affect reporters from major publications like the Arizona Republic and even the Associated Press.

David Gowan, the Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives, says that the decision to enforce a background check requirement was motivated entirely by security. Strangely, though, he also says that the decision was inspired after a man in the gallery began shouting as part of a protest. Why House leaders made the leap from an incident with a civilian in the gallery to making it more difficult for reporters to access the House floor hasn't been explained and doesn't make much sense. It's also unclear how this measure will offer extra protection for House members since anyone—including reporters with criminal histories—will evidently be allowed to watch House sessions from the gallery.

It also isn't clear from the Sputnik News article what types of background checks the Arizona House will require reporters to face, or how quickly those checks will be processed. One would assume that the House would use a "flash" background check system to get near-instantaneous information about a reporter's criminal history. Such vetting systems are growing more popular in school districts where volunteers are required to undergo background checks.

However, the Sputnik News article did note that reporters had to cover the last House session from the gallery because they were barred from accessing the floor. Given that fact, the Arizona House of Representatives might need more time to run background checks, in which case reporters wouldn't be able to access House sessions unless they had been pre-screened.

Source: http://sputniknews.com/us/20160411/1037798856/arizona-requiring-journalists-undergo-background-checks.html


Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • June 18

  • June 14 Ban the box laws aim to improve opportunities for employment. Could they have the opposite effect instead?
  • June 13 Jacobs Petroleum Products is a regional petroleum company that operates throughout Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Maryland. Apart from their employees carrying much responsibility and have frequent contact with customers, the company’s hiring also tends to be segmented since individual store managers are responsible for hiring talent for their own stores. In this employment landscape, Jacobs Petroleum Products needed a reliable and effective way to screen its new hires for criminal infractions and other red flags.
  • June 12

    The University of Wisconsin System may tweak its hiring and reference check processes. The potential changes come after one of UW’s assistant deans was accused of sexual harassment.


  • June 07 Stories of abuse by coaches in youth sports leagues continue to crop up around the country, but rules and guidelines remain patchy and enforcement is often lacking. The struggle to implement an effective system continues nationwide.
  • June 07 Financial background checks, usually referred to as credit history checks, can be an effective way to find out if a candidate is fit to handle accounts, financial data, and other assets at your business.
  • June 06 The Society for Human Resource Management and the Charles Koch Institute recently commissioned a survey to find out how willing employers were to hire people with criminal records. The study indicates that managers, HR professionals, and employees themselves are becoming more comfortable with the idea of hiring and working with ex-offenders.
  • June 04 Are fingerprint background checks the gold standard for employee screening, or are they overhyped? We look at some of the myths and misconceptions surrounding these checks.
  • June 04 The organization, The Family Resource Center of North Mississippi (FRCNMS) was founded on the belief that families are the heart of community and that promoting healthy families leads to healthy communities. Read more about how they carefully screen and vet new employees with the help of backgroundchecks.com.
  • June 01 Past mistakes can have lingering effects in criminal records that appear on background checks. People with minor convictions can erase those mistakes for help starting over.