Arizona Wants Background Checks for Certain Journalists

By Michael Klazema on 4/12/2016

In an interesting development, leaders within the Arizona House of Representatives are going to start requiring background checks for journalists that cover the House. According to Sputnik News there is a reason for the background checks: traditionally, journalists covering House of Representatives matters aren’t just writing about the political body from afar. Rather, journalists in these positions receive key cards that give them free, unfettered access to the House floor. Apparently, these reporters can even access House facilities when the House of Representatives isn't in session. Or, at least, they could.

Based on the Sputnik News report, the Arizona House of Representatives is done giving journalists favored treatment. Going forward, any journalist hoping to interview state lawmakers about pending legislation or House votes will have to pass a criminal background checks to gain access to the floor. Any reporter who has been convicted of a felony in the past decade or a misdemeanor in the last five years will be "barred" from accessing the House floor. Reporters who fail their background checks or refuse to undergo the screening process will be asked to sit in the gallery instead.

It isn't just small-time newspapers or bloggers who could end up barred from the House floor, either. On the contrary, the new background check requirements will affect reporters from major publications like the Arizona Republic and even the Associated Press.

David Gowan, the Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives, says that the decision to enforce a background check requirement was motivated entirely by security. Strangely, though, he also says that the decision was inspired after a man in the gallery began shouting as part of a protest. Why House leaders made the leap from an incident with a civilian in the gallery to making it more difficult for reporters to access the House floor hasn't been explained and doesn't make much sense. It's also unclear how this measure will offer extra protection for House members since anyone—including reporters with criminal histories—will evidently be allowed to watch House sessions from the gallery.

It also isn't clear from the Sputnik News article what types of background checks the Arizona House will require reporters to face, or how quickly those checks will be processed. One would assume that the House would use a "flash" background check system to get near-instantaneous information about a reporter's criminal history. Such vetting systems are growing more popular in school districts where volunteers are required to undergo background checks.

However, the Sputnik News article did note that reporters had to cover the last House session from the gallery because they were barred from accessing the floor. Given that fact, the Arizona House of Representatives might need more time to run background checks, in which case reporters wouldn't be able to access House sessions unless they had been pre-screened.


Industry News

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.
  • February 27 Governor Asa Hutchinson signed House Bill 2216 which amends the employer’s directives regarding a current or prospective employee’s social media account.
  • February 23 A Texas summer camp is in the spotlight after an unflattering investigation from a local news channel. The case has some parents asking what they can do to vet summer camp programs before enrolling their kids.