Pennsylvania Enacts a New Medical Marijuana Law

By Michael Klazema on 5/23/2016

On April 17, 2016, Pennsylvania passed the Medical Marijuana Act which legalizes the prescription and use of medical marijuana for individuals with a serious medical condition and establishes a medical marijuana program. The new marijuana act, effective May 17, 2016, includes antidiscrimination provisions and work exceptions for employers.

Section 2103 (B) states, “No employers may discharge, threaten, refuse to hire or otherwise discriminate or retaliate against an employee regarding an employee’s compensation, terms, conditions, location or privileges solely on the basis of employee’s status as an individual who is certified to use marijuana.”

Employers may not allow an employee, who is under the influence of medical marijuana, to perform the following tasks:

1.    Operate or be in physical control of chemicals which requires a permit issued by the federal or state government agency;

2.    Work with high-voltage electricity or any other public utility;

3.    Perform any employment duties at heights or in confined spaces, including but not limited to mining, or

4.    Perform any duty which could result in a public health or safety risk.

Excluding an employee from these duties listed above is not an adverse employment decision, even if the prohibitions result in financial harm to the employee.

The act allows the employer to discipline an employee for being under the influence of medical marijuana in the workplace when the employee’s conduct falls below the standard of care normally accepted for the position. There is no requirement for the employer to make any accommodation of the use of medical marijuana on the property or premises of any place of employment.

Click the link below to view the act.

What this means to you

  • This applies to all employers in Pennsylvania.
  • The new act allows employers to discipline an employee for being under the influence of medical marijuana in the workplace when the employee’s conduct falls below the standard of care normally accepted for the position.
  • Restricting an employee under the influence of medical marijuana from performing four specified duties is not an adverse employment decision, even if the prohibition results in financial harm to the employee.
There is no requirement for employers to accommodate the use of medical marijuana on the property or premise of any place of employment.  

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.
  • February 27 Governor Asa Hutchinson signed House Bill 2216 which amends the employer’s directives regarding a current or prospective employee’s social media account.
  • February 23 A Texas summer camp is in the spotlight after an unflattering investigation from a local news channel. The case has some parents asking what they can do to vet summer camp programs before enrolling their kids.