Blog

 
     

New Requirements Could Be Coming to NYC's Ban the Box Law

By Michael Klazema on 5/27/2016

In October 2015, New York City's "Fair Chance Act," officially banning the box for all private and public employers operating within city limits went into effect. Under the law, businesses cannot ask questions about criminal history on job applications and must wait to conduct a background check on an applicant until after making a conditional offer of employment. Now that the law is in place, the New York City Commission on Human Rights wants to add new rules to the law. These changes, if approved, would require employers to adjust their processes for vetting their applicants further.

According to a report from the law website Lexology.com, the NYC Commission on Human Rights wants to impose several new rules upon employers regarding job applications. Already, private businesses in New York City have had to revise their job applications to remove questions about criminal history. If the Commission gets its wish, companies in the city would be legally barred from including language in their applications asking candidates to authorize future background checks. In fact, the rules would prohibit employers from even explicitly stating that there is a requirement for a background check for certain positions. That's not to say that there would be a ban on companies from actually requiring background checks; they just couldn't make that requirement clear on applications or job listings.

Instead, employers would have to approach candidates later in the process to inform them about background check requirements. Under the new rules, the background check itself wouldn't be the only thing delayed until after a conditional offer of employment. On the contrary, employers would have to extend a provisional offer before they could ask applicants to authorize a background check.

All of these requirements would apply to large corporations that use the same applications in various cities or states. Of course, not all areas have the same employment conditions as New York City. Most jurisdictions don't have “ban the box” legislation in place, and even those that do don't enforce some of the requirements that NYC's Commission on Human Rights does. As such, multi-state or multi-jurisdictional employees might include a disclaimer on their applications, telling NYC applicants that they don't have to provide information about their criminal histories or consent to background checks. The Commission's new requirements would render these disclaimers illegal, forcing multi-state employers to create entirely different applications for New York City candidates.

New York City's Fair Chance Act was a milestone because it represented a pledge to fight employment discrimination and criminal recidivism in the biggest city in the United States. However, these new requirements would do little to help ex-offenders find jobs. Eliminating the criminal history question from job applications makes sense because it means that employers aren't biased against individual candidates from the word go. Delaying the background check until after the conditional offer of employment also makes sense, because it gives ex-convicts a chance to prove themselves to employers before their past misdeeds get dragged into the conversation.

However, prohibiting employers from getting background check authorization until after extending an employment offer doesn't make sense. Nor does barring employers from stating in any capacity that background checks are a requirement for a job. While these rule changes might make it so that fewer ex-offenders are scared away from applying for certain jobs, it also could create a false sense of security for those applicants. Background checks are almost universally required for any job these days. Applicants—criminal record or no—deserve to know if they are going to have to pass a background check to get hired. There is no compelling reason to rob applicants of this valuable information.

The New York City Commission on Human Rights has been mulling these rule change possibilities since February, so expect a final verdict soon.

Source: http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=7ff8ad5d-8130-44cc-bb95-b72e778ef97b

 


Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • June 20 Repeat background checks are becoming more common, with companies in India leading the charge. What does this trend look like, and how can employers embrace it now to stay ahead of the curve?
  • June 19

    Every federal job involves a background check of some kind. These background checks and how they are evaluated vary based on job, department, and security clearance level.


  • June 18

  • June 14 Ban the box laws aim to improve opportunities for employment. Could they have the opposite effect instead?
  • June 13 Jacobs Petroleum Products is a regional petroleum company that operates throughout Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Maryland. Apart from their employees carrying much responsibility and have frequent contact with customers, the company’s hiring also tends to be segmented since individual store managers are responsible for hiring talent for their own stores. In this employment landscape, Jacobs Petroleum Products needed a reliable and effective way to screen its new hires for criminal infractions and other red flags.
  • June 12

    The University of Wisconsin System may tweak its hiring and reference check processes. The potential changes come after one of UW’s assistant deans was accused of sexual harassment.


  • June 07 Stories of abuse by coaches in youth sports leagues continue to crop up around the country, but rules and guidelines remain patchy and enforcement is often lacking. The struggle to implement an effective system continues nationwide.
  • June 07 Financial background checks, usually referred to as credit history checks, can be an effective way to find out if a candidate is fit to handle accounts, financial data, and other assets at your business.
  • June 06 The Society for Human Resource Management and the Charles Koch Institute recently commissioned a survey to find out how willing employers were to hire people with criminal records. The study indicates that managers, HR professionals, and employees themselves are becoming more comfortable with the idea of hiring and working with ex-offenders.
  • June 04 Are fingerprint background checks the gold standard for employee screening, or are they overhyped? We look at some of the myths and misconceptions surrounding these checks.