Former Indiana Prison Guard Had Colorful Criminal Record

By Michael Klazema on 7/7/2016

A recent case in Indiana has shown how aliases can hoodwink background checks if employers aren't careful. The situation involved an employer, the Indiana Department of Correction, that hired a 52-year-old man to work as a corrections officer without flagging his significant criminal history. According to a report from the Associated Press, the man was able to slip through the cracks and avoid a red flag on his background check by using a different name.

The officer in question worked at the Pendleton Correctional Facility from 2007 to 2015. The man had convictions on his record for attempted murder, burglary, robbery, and kidnapping. However, none of those convictions showed up on his background check because he used a different name on his application than the one under which he was convicted.

The name wasn't just an alias: the man legally changed his name in 1993 while he was serving a prison sentence in New York state. However, he failed to disclose his criminal record on his job application to work for the Indiana Department of Correction. Because of that fact, the man has been indicted on a new set of charges—this time from the federal government. The charges allege that he defrauded the State of Indiana by lying about his criminal history, a lie that led to eight years of employment and income of $175,000.

All Indiana Department of Correction employees have to go through background checks at the time of their hiring. Those checks include searches of the Indiana state criminal database as well as driving history checks and sex offender registry checks. The AP report noted that the checks include some search of multi-jurisdictional "national crime databases." Reference checks round out the process. The Department of Correction also reportedly takes fingerprints of each employee on their first day of work. Precisely what those fingerprints are used for and whether or not they are used to double check the department's name-based background checks remains unclear.

A true fingerprint background check with multi-jurisdictional reach might have uncovered the man's criminal record despite his name change. Similarly, a Social Security Number check would have highlighted the fact that he had lived and worked under two names. This revelation could have come as a red flag for the Department of Correction, who could have then run background checks of his second name.



Industry News

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.