U.S. Judges Cannot Expunge Federal Convictions, Appeals Court Finds

By Michael Klazema on 8/16/2016

In state and county courts, ex-offenders can win the right to have their criminal records expunged. In the past, reformed ex-criminals have pursued expungement to improve their chances of finding gainful employment. Judges will grant these petitions if the plaintiff in question has exhibited a lengthy period of law-abiding behavior, though the nature and severity of the original crime are also taken into account.

According to a recent Reuters report, federal judges are not permitted to expunge federal criminal records. This ruling was passed down by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals based in New York and pertained to a federal case involving insurance fraud. The original case dates back to 1997 and involved a woman referred to in court records as "Jane Doe." Doe played a role in staging a car accident to get a fraudulent insurance payout.

Doe was a passenger in the staged accident. When she was convicted by a federal jury in 2001, she avoided prison time but received a federal criminal conviction on her record and five years’ probation along with an initial 10-month home detention sentence, factors that made it difficult for her to find a job. Before the conviction, Doe had worked as a home health aide. When her federal conviction began showing up on her background checks, it made potential employers skeptical of hiring her.

Doe brought her case before U.S. District Judge John Gleeson, who ruled to expunge her federal conviction in May 2015. In Gleeson's eyes, Doe had paid her debt to society when she finished her five years of probation. He didn't believe that Doe deserved to face a sentence of "a lifetime of unemployment."

The United States Justice Department disagreed with Gleeson's ruling and brought the case to the Circuit Court of Appeals. Now, the appellate court has ruled that Gleeson overstepped by granting expungement to Doe. The ruling bars any federal judge from expunging any federal convictions for the foreseeable future, even if the convictions in question render ex-offenders unable to find jobs. The Court of Appeals said that Congress would have to pass a bill to give U.S. judges the power to expunge federal convictions.

The Fair Chance Employment movement and the concept of criminal justice reform have been the subject of multiple recent headlines. Ban the box policies have spread rapidly throughout the country, with the goal of giving ex-offenders a better chance to compete for jobs. Reform activist groups have not yet publicly released statements regarding the ruling.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.