Massachusetts Bans Employers from Asking about Salary History in Job Interviews

By Michael Klazema on 8/26/2016

On August 1, 2016, Governor Charlie Baker signed Senate Bill 2119 “An Act to Establish Pay Equity” that made Massachusetts the first state to prohibit employers from asking for applicants’ salary histories during the hiring process. The new state law requires the employer to pay their male and female employees equally for comparable work. As part of the law, Massachusetts placed significant restrictions on employers obtaining prior compensation history. The theory is, at least in part, that using prior salary to decide what pay to offer locks in patterns of prior discrimination against women.

Under Chapter 149 Section 105A(c), it is an unlawful practice for employers to:

  • Screen job applicants based on their wage, including benefits or other compensation or salary histories, including by requiring that an applicant’s prior wages, including benefits or other compensation or salary history satisfy minimum or maximum criteria; or request or require as a condition of being interviewed, or as a condition of continuing to be considered for an offer of employment, that an applicant disclose prior wages or salary history; or
  • Seek the salary history of any prospective employee from any current or former employer; but a prospective employee may provide written authorization to a prospective employer to confirm prior wages, including benefits or other compensation or salary history only after any offer of employment with compensation has been made to the prospective employee.

Employers will have to wait until after they extend an offer of employment with compensation in order to ask about an applicant’s salary history, or the applicants can voluntarily disclose their salary information to the employer. The employer cannot seek such a voluntary disclosure.

The new law will take effect on July 1, 2018 and is accessible here for review:

What This Means to You:

  • This applies to all employers in Massachusetts.
  • Employers may not seek compensation history from job applicants or from prior or current employers.
  • Employers can seek compensation history information once they extend offers of employment with compensation.
Employers may verify compensation history that a job applicant discloses if the job applicant volunteered that information. 

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.