Are Tougher Ridesharing Background Checks Coming to California?

By Michael Klazema on 9/5/2016

In California on the last day of August, the state legislature approved a bill that could fundamentally change how ridesharing companies like Uber and Lyft do business in the state. Unlike other laws or ordinances that have sought to regulate the ridesharing industry, the California bill makes no mention of fingerprint background checks. Instead, the bill would require ridesharing companies to reject drivers who have been convicted of certain crimes.

The bill would make it illegal for Uber, Lyft, and other ridesharing companies to hire drivers who are registered sex offenders. It would also bar these companies from hiring anyone with a DUI conviction or anyone who has been convicted of a violent felony in the past seven years.

The bill passed through the legislature in the final hours of its session, moving now to Governor Jerry Brown for approval.

According to a report from the Los Angeles Times, the bill didn't have the complete support of the California legislature. While the bill's author and top advocate argued that it would help to keep passengers safe, critics of the legislation said it would make it harder for ex-offenders to find jobs. Companies like Uber and Lyft have made it easier for anyone to make money if they have a car and a few free hours. However, as critics note, by setting absolute boundaries for who is allowed to drive for these companies, the California Legislature might prevent ex-offenders from taking an opportunity to make an honest living.

Assemblyman Jim Cooper—the author of the bill—argued that this type of legislation is vital to give customers of ridesharing services the protection and peace of mind that they deserve. Uber and Lyft drivers have been involved in multiple sexual assault cases, physical assaults, deaths, and other crimes and incidents. The website Who's Driving You? is dedicated to keeping track of all of these incidents. Cooper pointed to an investigation in Los Angeles and San Francisco in 2015 in which area prosecutors combed through lists of Uber drivers and found more than two dozen people with long criminal rap sheets.

If Governor Brown signs the legislation, ridesharing companies will have to be considerably stricter with their driver background checks. Every time a ridesharing company hires a sex offender, a person with a DUI conviction, or a violent felony conviction from the past seven years, they will receive a fine from the state. The legislation dictates that the fine amount can be up to $5,000.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.