Amazon Accused of Using Background Checks to Fire Drivers Illegally

By Michael Klazema on 10/16/2016

Could soon be facing a background check lawsuit in Boston? Per a report from the Boston Globe, the company and its CEO, Jeff Bezos, have been accused of unfair and possibly illegal employee dismissals. The Globe says that Amazon recently fired "dozens" of drivers in Boston, using criminal background check findings as the sole justification for doing so.

The accusations come from the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights and Economic Judgment. The Committee says that, in August, Bezos told contract firms that fulfill delivery services for Amazon to audit their driver background check reports. Bezos allegedly instructed Amazon's contractors to "deactivate" certain drivers based on criminal histories. Whether Bezos' alleged remarks applied to all Amazon deliveries contractors or just those in Boston is unclear.

The Globe report said that the contract companies were only supposed to cut drivers "whose background checks didn't meet the company's requirements." The Lawyers' Committee claims that at least one Boston-area Amazon contractor fired 30 to 40 employees based on their background check findings. The Committee said that the drivers were hard workers and had no issues with job performance. Per reports, many were not fired based on major criminal offenses but rather “minor” crimes.

The Lawyers' Committee is considering a discrimination lawsuit against Amazon in accordance with EEOC policies. The EEOC prohibits companies from using background check policies that disproportionately impact minority groups. Per the Globe report, most of the Boston drivers who lost their jobs were either black or Latino.

The EEOC bars companies from summarily discriminating against individuals with criminal records. While businesses are allowed to disqualify applicants or fire employees based on criminal findings, they must make those decisions on a case-by-case basis. Specifically, businesses must take the nature and severity of each offense into the account as well as how it relates to the job at hand. Typically, minor offenses or offenses far in the past are not viewed by the EEOC as acceptable grounds for disqualification or dismissal.

The Lawyers' Committee believes that Amazon failed to meet both of these EEOC standards. In addition, the company allegedly fired its Boston drivers without giving each employee a chance to dispute the accuracy of the background check findings. This oversight would be a violation of the FCRA, which requires businesses to go through several formal steps before taking adverse employment action due to background checks.

The Globe report says that the Lawyers' Committee is waiting for Amazon to respond to their accusations before filing a lawsuit. So far, Amazon has said that driver background checks are done to preserve "safety and customer trust."


Industry News

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.
  • February 27 Governor Asa Hutchinson signed House Bill 2216 which amends the employer’s directives regarding a current or prospective employee’s social media account.
  • February 23 A Texas summer camp is in the spotlight after an unflattering investigation from a local news channel. The case has some parents asking what they can do to vet summer camp programs before enrolling their kids.