Oregon Bill Would Allow Ridesharing Organizations to Operate Statewide

By Michael Klazema on 4/10/2017

According to its critics, a bill currently pending in the Oregon House of Representatives could make it more difficult for municipalities to govern ridesharing activities in the state.

Per a report from KATU News, House Bill 3246 would create a “statewide transportation network” in Oregon. Uber currently only operates “in the Portland metro area and surrounding cities” according to Bryce Bennett, who serves as general manager for the transportation company in Oregon.

As coverage explains, most cities have the freedom to regulate companies like Uber and Lyft as they see fit. If ridesharing businesses fail to meet local rules and regulations—such as mandatory fingerprint background checks for drivers—they are not permitted to operate in those areas. Uber and Lyft made headlines when they left Austin, Texas entirely after the city imposed a fingerprint background check law for ridesharing services.

Instead of letting local municipalities regulate ridesharing services, the bill would impose statewide regulations on companies like Uber and Lyft, reports explain. Ridesharing companies would have to register with the Department of Consumer and Business Services, run background checks on their drivers, and ensure that each driver has required insurance coverage.

The bill is not without controversy. Dan Saltzman, the Portland City Commissioner, claims the bill would make it difficult for municipal governments to tweak policies in accordance with community needs. A state representative challenged Uber’s Bryce Bennett when he argued that Uber’s existing background checks are stronger than a fingerprint check through the FBI database. Bennett defended Uber’s checks, saying that they are “three-pronged” to incorporate driving history, Social Security Numbers for address changes and “closed court cases,” and sex offender history. Margaret Doherty, a State Representative, said she was “appalled” that Bennett didn’t think his drivers needed fingerprint background checks as well.

Per coverage, Uber officials have previously suggested that long processing times for FBI database checks would serve as a barrier to entry for drivers who might otherwise consider working for Uber.


Industry News

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • April 19

    In a post-Penn State scandal world, universities are more aware than ever of the need to protect students by vetting faculty. The extent of this vetting and its implementation are hot topics causing controversy on campuses nationwide.

  • April 18 Amazon’s criminal background checks look back seven years and consider any convictions from that time. All finalists must complete criminal background searches, reference checks, and drug tests.
  • April 17

    From entry-level positions to roles involving “Top Secret” security clearances, military roles can involve a variety of different background investigations. We look at what different types of military background checks entail.

  • April 17 A new CNBC series is looking at true HR stories and their lessons. The most recent installment looked at the consequences of not running background checks.
  • April 12 Complicated by patchwork legislation and continuing federal prohibition, marijuana legalization poses several challenges for employers and would-be employees alike. Despite its legal status in a growing number of states, marijuana continues to negatively impact job-seekers.
  • April 12 Familiarizing yourself with the legality of background checks is essential. Continue reading about laws and regulations.
  • April 11

    Understanding the background check obligations in your industry and state.

  • April 10 A former employee of a senior assisted living community is facing charges for stealing from a resident. The alleged theft occurred after the employee gained access to the patient’s credit cards and checking account.
  • April 06 Background checks aren’t pass or fail. Employers consider various factors before making any hiring decision based on background check data.
  • April 06  Level 1 and Level 2 are terms used in Florida law to describe background check requirements for employers. We look at what a Level 2 background check entails.