8,200 Massachusetts Ridesharing Contractors Fail Mandatory Background Checks

By Michael Klazema on 4/20/2017
In November, Massachusetts passed regulations to impose the strictest background checks in the country on individuals who contract for ridesharing services like Uber and Lyft. The results of those stricter background checks have been made public. Per a report from The Boston Globe, the state ran checks on nearly 71,000 drivers who work as contractors for companies like Uber and Lyft. The checks identified more than 8,200 contractors with red-flag offenses that will bar them from working for ridesharing companies in the future.

The 71,000 drivers that the State of Massachusetts screened for this first round of background checks had all passed the background checks in place at Uber and Lyft, coverage explains. Those checks have received criticism over the past few years while Uber has argued that they are faster and more reliable than many other types of background screenings. More than 11.5% of drivers cleared by internal checks from ridesharing companies failed to meet the standards put in place by the state.

Most people who failed their checks did so because of driving-related issues, reports note. Some had driving offenses on their records and others were driving on suspended licenses. Massachusetts doesn’t permit individuals to drive for ridesharing companies if they have been licensed for less than five years. The 8,200 failed background checks include these newly-licensed drivers.

Per the Associated Press, 300 drivers had felony convictions that had gone overlooked under the Uber and Lyft checks. 51 of the drivers flagged by the state checks were registered sex offenders.

While Massachusetts does not run fingerprint background checks on drivers—something that many legislators are urging for Uber and Lyft contractors—the state does examine state criminal records and driving histories. The Boston Globe report quoted a commissioner who oversees ridesharing regulations in Portland who said that the new system in Massachusetts, and the number of people that failed checks after they had already been cleared by Uber and Lyft, offers “food for thought.”

Per reports, Uber and Lyft have hit back against the Massachusetts checks following the announcement that 8,200 drivers failed their screenings. Uber said that the checks included “an unfair and unjust indefinite lookback period” and cost thousands of people “access to economic opportunities.” Uber and Lyft are only legally permitted to look back at the last seven years of a contractor’s driving history. The Massachusetts checks permit the state to look back decades.

Industry News

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.