Blog

 
     

8,200 Massachusetts Ridesharing Contractors Fail Mandatory Background Checks

By Michael Klazema on 4/20/2017
In November, Massachusetts passed regulations to impose the strictest background checks in the country on individuals who contract for ridesharing services like Uber and Lyft. The results of those stricter background checks have been made public. Per a report from The Boston Globe, the state ran checks on nearly 71,000 drivers who work as contractors for companies like Uber and Lyft. The checks identified more than 8,200 contractors with red-flag offenses that will bar them from working for ridesharing companies in the future.

The 71,000 drivers that the State of Massachusetts screened for this first round of background checks had all passed the background checks in place at Uber and Lyft, coverage explains. Those checks have received criticism over the past few years while Uber has argued that they are faster and more reliable than many other types of background screenings. More than 11.5% of drivers cleared by internal checks from ridesharing companies failed to meet the standards put in place by the state.

Most people who failed their checks did so because of driving-related issues, reports note. Some had driving offenses on their records and others were driving on suspended licenses. Massachusetts doesn’t permit individuals to drive for ridesharing companies if they have been licensed for less than five years. The 8,200 failed background checks include these newly-licensed drivers.

Per the Associated Press, 300 drivers had felony convictions that had gone overlooked under the Uber and Lyft checks. 51 of the drivers flagged by the state checks were registered sex offenders.

While Massachusetts does not run fingerprint background checks on drivers—something that many legislators are urging for Uber and Lyft contractors—the state does examine state criminal records and driving histories. The Boston Globe report quoted a commissioner who oversees ridesharing regulations in Portland who said that the new system in Massachusetts, and the number of people that failed checks after they had already been cleared by Uber and Lyft, offers “food for thought.”

Per reports, Uber and Lyft have hit back against the Massachusetts checks following the announcement that 8,200 drivers failed their screenings. Uber said that the checks included “an unfair and unjust indefinite lookback period” and cost thousands of people “access to economic opportunities.” Uber and Lyft are only legally permitted to look back at the last seven years of a contractor’s driving history. The Massachusetts checks permit the state to look back decades.

Sources: https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2017/04/10/massachusetts-uber-checks-has-other-states-weighing-more-thorough-driver-reviews/BvE73A4eotXG2vDigBlpxJ/story.html

http://www.claimsjournal.com/news/east/2017/04/10/277878.htm

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/11/29/massachusetts-adopts-strict-background-check-rules-for-uber-lyft-drivers.html
Industry News

Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • June 20 Repeat background checks are becoming more common, with companies in India leading the charge. What does this trend look like, and how can employers embrace it now to stay ahead of the curve?
  • June 19

    Every federal job involves a background check of some kind. These background checks and how they are evaluated vary based on job, department, and security clearance level.


  • June 18

  • June 14 Ban the box laws aim to improve opportunities for employment. Could they have the opposite effect instead?
  • June 13 Jacobs Petroleum Products is a regional petroleum company that operates throughout Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Maryland. Apart from their employees carrying much responsibility and have frequent contact with customers, the company’s hiring also tends to be segmented since individual store managers are responsible for hiring talent for their own stores. In this employment landscape, Jacobs Petroleum Products needed a reliable and effective way to screen its new hires for criminal infractions and other red flags.
  • June 12

    The University of Wisconsin System may tweak its hiring and reference check processes. The potential changes come after one of UW’s assistant deans was accused of sexual harassment.


  • June 07 Stories of abuse by coaches in youth sports leagues continue to crop up around the country, but rules and guidelines remain patchy and enforcement is often lacking. The struggle to implement an effective system continues nationwide.
  • June 07 Financial background checks, usually referred to as credit history checks, can be an effective way to find out if a candidate is fit to handle accounts, financial data, and other assets at your business.
  • June 06 The Society for Human Resource Management and the Charles Koch Institute recently commissioned a survey to find out how willing employers were to hire people with criminal records. The study indicates that managers, HR professionals, and employees themselves are becoming more comfortable with the idea of hiring and working with ex-offenders.
  • June 04 Are fingerprint background checks the gold standard for employee screening, or are they overhyped? We look at some of the myths and misconceptions surrounding these checks.