Blog

 
     

New York City Bans Employers from Asking about Salary History in Job Interviews

By Michael Klazema on 5/12/2017

On April 5, 2017, the New York City Council passed an ordinance that amends the administrative code by prohibiting employers from inquiring about or relying on a prospective employee’s salary history.  Mayor Bill de Blasio signed the ordinance on May 4, 2017, and it will go into effect 180 days from that date. The ordinance offers the rationale that, “the bill can reduce the likelihood that women will be prejudiced by prior salary levels and help break the cycle of gender pay inequity.” The ordinance makes it an unlawful discriminatory practice for employers to:

  • Inquire about the salary history of an applicant for employment; or
  • Rely on the wage history of an applicant in determining the salary, benefits, or other compensation for such applicant during the hiring process, including the negotiation of a contract.

Employers may discuss with the applicant their expectation with respect to salary, benefits, and other compensation, including but not limited to “unvested equity or deferred compensation that an applicant would forfeit or have cancelled by virtue of the applicant’s resignation from their current employer.” If the applicant voluntarily discloses their salary history, the employer may verify the applicant’s salary history and use the salary history to determine the applicant’s salary, benefits, and other compensation.

The ordinance does not apply to:

  • Any action taken by an employer, employment agency, or employee or agent thereof, pursuant to any federal, state, or local law that specifically authorizes the disclosures or verification of salary history for employment purposes, or specifically requires knowledge of salary to determine an employee’s compensation;
  • Applicants for internal transfer or promotion with their current employer;
  • Any attempt by an employer, employment agency, or employee or agent thereof, to verify an applicant’s disclosure of non-salary related information or conduct a background check, provided that if such verification or background check discloses the applicant’s salary history, such disclosure shall not be relied upon for purposes of determining the salary, benefits, or other compensation of such applicant during the hiring process, including the negotiation of a contract; or
  • Public employee positions for which salary, benefits, or other compensation are determined pursuant to procedures established by collective bargaining.

New York City is the second city in the country to ban employers from asking job applicants about their wage history in 2017, following in the footsteps of Philadelphia and the state of Massachusetts that passed similar legislation in 2016.

What This Means to You:

  • The ordinance applies to private sector employers in New York City.
  • Employers in New York City may not seek compensation history from job applicants (with some exceptions).
  • Employers may rely on the compensation history of the job applicant only when the applicant voluntarily discloses their wage history or when an exception explicitly permits it. 
The new ordinance is accessible here for review:
http://legistar.council.nyc.gov/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=2813507&GUID=938399E5-6608-42F5-9C83-9D2665D9496F&Options=ID%7cText%7c&Search

Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • May 16 — A Tennessee teacher convicted of the statutory rape of a student in 2007 has had his teaching license reinstated after a lengthy legal battle. The teacher had his criminal record expunged in 2011 which allowed him to win a court case against the State Board of Education.
  • May 12 — New York City Bans Employers from Asking about Salary History in Job Interviews
  • May 04 — Indiana’s governor signed an executive order banning the box for jobs in the public sector. The order makes Indiana the 27th state to implement a ban the box policy at the state level.
  • May 02 — An Indiana healthcare management company is facing a lawsuit from a woman whose job offer from the company was rescinded last year. The woman alleges that the company did not follow FCRA protocol when using contents of her background check report to disqualify her from consideration.
  • April 28 — A school district in Georgia planned to run randomized drug and alcohol tests on its bus drivers after one county bus driver was arrested for a DUI. According to a lawyer consulted by the local Board of Education, the policy might conflict with court precedent.
  • April 20 — Massachusetts recently ran background checks on thousands of drivers who contract for ridesharing services like Uber and Lyft. More than 8,000 people failed the checks for reasons ranging from felonies to sex offender statuses to suspended licenses.
  • April 10 — Oregon legislators have proposed a bill that would allow ridesharing companies to operate statewide. The bill’s critics argue that it doesn’t call for fingerprint background checks and would make it difficult for local municipalities to impose their own regulations.
  • April 06 — Idaho State University recently instituted a background check policy for faculty members and other full-time staff. Previously, the school only conducted reference checks.
  • April 03 — An Illinois man has been sentenced to three years in prison for failing to register as a sex offender and working as a youth sports referee. The state legislature is considering a bill that would require more in-depth background checks for licensed sporting officials.
  • March 13 — A Denver hospital was in the headlines last year for hiring a surgery technician who stole syringes of the painkiller fentanyl. New information suggests that a more thorough background check could have flagged the man’s addiction issues.