Washington Governor Vetoes University Ban the Box Bill

By Michael Klazema on 6/12/2017
It has become increasingly common over the past few years for employers, cities, counties, and even states to implement policies or laws “banning the box.” This practice, which removes questions about criminal history from employment applications, is praised by proponents as a way to drive criminal justice reform and reduce recidivism. Per coverage, a bill that went through the legislative process would have extended ban the box practices to Washington’s colleges and universities.

The bill in Washington would have made it illegal for colleges and universities to inquire about student criminal history. Per a recent report from The Washington Post, the bill won’t become law. State Governor Larry Hogan, a Republican, vetoed the bill.

The bill passed both chambers of the Washington legislature. According to the Washington Post, the legislation received “veto-proof majorities” and had “bipartisan support.” As reports indicate, despite the supposed cross-party appeal of the bill, Hogan objected to certain elements of it. In his veto letter, Hogan argued that the legislation in its current form would do a disservice to colleges by “curtailing [their] ability to ensure a safe campus environment.”

The Governor has previously advocated for legislation that expanded expungement opportunities, reduced sentencing penalties for non-violent drug offenders, and other changes that he claimed would support criminal justice in Washington.

Per coverage, Hogan claimed that he might sign a future version of the ban the box bill for colleges and universities if it were approached differently. The Governor said he took issue with the fact that the legislation did not differentiate between violent felonies and more minor offenses. He suggested legislation that bars colleges from asking prospective students “questions about misdemeanor or nonviolent convictions while still allowing questions about violent felonies.”

Maggie McIntosh, who sponsored the bill in the Washington House of Representatives, said she was “sorry” and “perplexed” by Hogan’s decision, reports note. She said she would look into pursuing a veto override for this particular bill, particularly considering the amount of bipartisan support it got leading up to the Governor’s veto.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • July 17 — Hourly Employee Screening: What Makes It Unique and Important infographic?Modern employers conduct background checks on most of the people they hire. These checks are most often used to screen full-time salaried workers. Part-timers and hourly employees are typically less likely to face a thorough background check or even go through a background screening at all. According to a survey conducted by, 67 percent of employers screen all of their part-time employees, compared to 83 percent of their full-time employees.
  • July 17 A Kentucky school district recently decided to stop paying for volunteer background checks. Going forward, volunteers will be expected to cover the cost of their own checks, which is $10 per person.
  • July 12 Seeking fresh employees for businesses, some states seek to reduce the number of people denied employment based on old or nonviolent crimes.
  • July 11 Multinational aerospace company - Safran Group - trusts to screen new hires, The products they manufacture can have major implications for aircraft safety and worldwide security. As such, the company needs to be extremely careful and deliberate about who it trusts to join the organization.
  • July 11 Recently cited for driving too fast? Here’s what a speeding ticket will do to your background check report.
  • July 10

    Could your business be vulnerable to employee theft? Protect yourself with more thorough background checks.

  • July 09 While Social Security Numbers aren’t required for criminal history checks, they can be beneficial. Here’s why.
  • July 05

    In June, Chicago Public Schools came under fire after a Chicago Tribune piece accused the district of not protecting students from sexual abusers. The district has announced plans to run background checks on all employees.

  • July 04 — How important are volunteer background checks? Do they even matter?
    Organizations that rely in part on volunteer labor consistently find themselves asking these questions. The assumption is usually that volunteer background checks are less important than background checks for full-time or part-time employees. According to a CareerBuilder survey from 2016, 72 percent of employers conduct background checks on all employees. A parallel statistic isn’t even available for volunteer checks. They are less common – and less valued.
  • July 03 #MeToo harassment allegations continue to reshape workplaces in every industry. As a result, many companies are looking to safeguard themselves from liability.