Washington Governor Vetoes University Ban the Box Bill

By Michael Klazema on 6/12/2017
It has become increasingly common over the past few years for employers, cities, counties, and even states to implement policies or laws “banning the box.” This practice, which removes questions about criminal history from employment applications, is praised by proponents as a way to drive criminal justice reform and reduce recidivism. Per coverage, a bill that went through the legislative process would have extended ban the box practices to Washington’s colleges and universities.

The bill in Washington would have made it illegal for colleges and universities to inquire about student criminal history. Per a recent report from The Washington Post, the bill won’t become law. State Governor Larry Hogan, a Republican, vetoed the bill.

The bill passed both chambers of the Washington legislature. According to the Washington Post, the legislation received “veto-proof majorities” and had “bipartisan support.” As reports indicate, despite the supposed cross-party appeal of the bill, Hogan objected to certain elements of it. In his veto letter, Hogan argued that the legislation in its current form would do a disservice to colleges by “curtailing [their] ability to ensure a safe campus environment.”

The Governor has previously advocated for legislation that expanded expungement opportunities, reduced sentencing penalties for non-violent drug offenders, and other changes that he claimed would support criminal justice in Washington.

Per coverage, Hogan claimed that he might sign a future version of the ban the box bill for colleges and universities if it were approached differently. The Governor said he took issue with the fact that the legislation did not differentiate between violent felonies and more minor offenses. He suggested legislation that bars colleges from asking prospective students “questions about misdemeanor or nonviolent convictions while still allowing questions about violent felonies.”

Maggie McIntosh, who sponsored the bill in the Washington House of Representatives, said she was “sorry” and “perplexed” by Hogan’s decision, reports note. She said she would look into pursuing a veto override for this particular bill, particularly considering the amount of bipartisan support it got leading up to the Governor’s veto.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • April 19

    In a post-Penn State scandal world, universities are more aware than ever of the need to protect students by vetting faculty. The extent of this vetting and its implementation are hot topics causing controversy on campuses nationwide.

  • April 18 Amazon’s criminal background checks look back seven years and consider any convictions from that time. All finalists must complete criminal background searches, reference checks, and drug tests.
  • April 17

    From entry-level positions to roles involving “Top Secret” security clearances, military roles can involve a variety of different background investigations. We look at what different types of military background checks entail.

  • April 17 A new CNBC series is looking at true HR stories and their lessons. The most recent installment looked at the consequences of not running background checks.
  • April 12 Complicated by patchwork legislation and continuing federal prohibition, marijuana legalization poses several challenges for employers and would-be employees alike. Despite its legal status in a growing number of states, marijuana continues to negatively impact job-seekers.
  • April 12 Familiarizing yourself with the legality of background checks is essential. Continue reading about laws and regulations.
  • April 11

    Understanding the background check obligations in your industry and state.

  • April 10 A former employee of a senior assisted living community is facing charges for stealing from a resident. The alleged theft occurred after the employee gained access to the patient’s credit cards and checking account.
  • April 06 Background checks aren’t pass or fail. Employers consider various factors before making any hiring decision based on background check data.
  • April 06  Level 1 and Level 2 are terms used in Florida law to describe background check requirements for employers. We look at what a Level 2 background check entails.