Blog

 
     

EEOC Files Lawsuit Against Janitorial Company for Race Discrimination

By Michael Klazema on 7/28/2017
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission recently filed a lawsuit against a large Tampa-based janitorial company, alleging racial discrimination in employment. The allegations include scrutiny of the company’s employee background check processes, saying that hiring managers actively tried to use background checks as a means of discouraging blacks from pursuing jobs with the company. Per a press release from the EEOC itself, the janitorial company, Diversified Maintenance Systems, LLC, is also accused of subjecting a black employee “to racial slurs” and “other discriminatory practices.”

The lawsuit does not concern how Diversified Maintenance Systems ran background checks or made hiring decisions based on their findings. Instead, the lawsuit alleges that hiring managers at the company were instructed to treat African-American candidates differently during the application and interview process. Specifically, hiring managers were told to emphasize the company’s use of criminal background checks in hiring when speaking to black candidates. The EEOC says this process was in place to tell black candidates that they need not apply if they had criminal records. The Commission also claims that the practice caused several African-Americans to withdraw their applications with the company.

The EEOC lawsuit alleges that Diversified Maintenance’s rhetoric about background checks had a disparate impact on African-American candidates. Therefore, the EEOC says that the practice qualifies as employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

In addition to the background check issue, the EEOC lawsuit identifies various other discriminatory hiring practices in which Diversified Maintenance Systems allegedly took part. For instance, the lawsuit claims that Diversified instructed district managers not to hire African-American employees without “special permission.” In a case where a black man was hired to a job with the company, the lawsuit alleges that he was subject to racial slurs and other harassment, despite his supervisory role. When the man complained about the discriminatory treatment to upper management, Diversified allegedly demoted him without taking action to curb the harassment issue.

Diversified Maintenance is a large company, with clients in all 50 states as well as Puerto Rico, Guam, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The EEOC allegations say that the company’s racial discrimination practices were limited to “Maryland and the Washington D.C. and Philadelphia metropolitan areas.”

The EEOC is seeking “injunctive relief” with this lawsuit. Said another way, the Commission expects Diversified Maintenance to cease its discriminatory practices and put policies in place to ensure equal employment opportunities for black candidates. Also, the lawsuit seeks “monetary remedies” to Dana Fields, the supervisor above, subject to racial harassment and demotion by the company, as well as to “a class of aggrieved African-American applicants.”

Sources:

https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/titlevii.cfm

https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/7-5-17.cfm

http://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/eeoc-s-race-discrimination-suit-against-40399/
Industry News
  EEOC

Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • July 17 — Hourly Employee Screening: What Makes It Unique and Important infographic?Modern employers conduct background checks on most of the people they hire. These checks are most often used to screen full-time salaried workers. Part-timers and hourly employees are typically less likely to face a thorough background check or even go through a background screening at all. According to a survey conducted by HR.com, 67 percent of employers screen all of their part-time employees, compared to 83 percent of their full-time employees.
  • July 17 A Kentucky school district recently decided to stop paying for volunteer background checks. Going forward, volunteers will be expected to cover the cost of their own checks, which is $10 per person.
  • July 12 Seeking fresh employees for businesses, some states seek to reduce the number of people denied employment based on old or nonviolent crimes.
  • July 11 Multinational aerospace company - Safran Group - trusts backgroundchecks.com to screen new hires, The products they manufacture can have major implications for aircraft safety and worldwide security. As such, the company needs to be extremely careful and deliberate about who it trusts to join the organization.
  • July 11 Recently cited for driving too fast? Here’s what a speeding ticket will do to your background check report.
  • July 10

    Could your business be vulnerable to employee theft? Protect yourself with more thorough background checks.


  • July 09 While Social Security Numbers aren’t required for criminal history checks, they can be beneficial. Here’s why.
  • July 05

    In June, Chicago Public Schools came under fire after a Chicago Tribune piece accused the district of not protecting students from sexual abusers. The district has announced plans to run background checks on all employees.


  • July 04 — How important are volunteer background checks? Do they even matter?
    Organizations that rely in part on volunteer labor consistently find themselves asking these questions. The assumption is usually that volunteer background checks are less important than background checks for full-time or part-time employees. According to a CareerBuilder survey from 2016, 72 percent of employers conduct background checks on all employees. A parallel statistic isn’t even available for volunteer checks. They are less common – and less valued.
  • July 03 #MeToo harassment allegations continue to reshape workplaces in every industry. As a result, many companies are looking to safeguard themselves from liability.