Chicago Bans the Box and More

By Michael Klazema on 1/16/2015

The City of Chicago recently passed an ordinance, number 02014-8347, that expands the State’s law within the city limits.

The City’s ordinance expands the coverage of the State’s restrictions to private employers that are licensed in Chicago or maintain a business facility within the city limits and have fewer than 15 employees. Employers subject to the ordinance, like those subject to the state law, may not inquire about, consider or require disclosure of an applicant’s criminal record or criminal history until after the applicant has been determined qualified for the position and notified that he or she will be interviewed, or after a conditional offer of employment is made if no interview is conducted. It has broader reach than the state law because it requires employers, regardless of size, to notify applicants if they were not selected for employment on the basis of their criminal history, whether entirely or partially.

The city ordinance has the same limited exceptions as the state law. They are:

  • When an employer is required to exclude applicants with certain criminal convictions from employment due to federal or state law;
  • When a fidelity bond or equivalent bond is required and an applicant’s conviction or one or more specified criminal offenses would disqualify the applicant from obtaining a bond. In this case, an employer may include a question or otherwise inquire whether the applicant has ever been convicted of any of these offenses; or
  • Employers that employ individuals licensed under the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) System Act.

The City of Chicago’s Commission on Human Relations has authority to assess fines for violations of the ordinance ranging from $ 100 to $1,000 for each offense, as well as, possible license discipline.

The ordinance also applies to a number of city agencies, and went into effect January 1, 2015.

Go here to view the City of Chicago Ordinance File 0214-8347:

What this update means for you:

  • The City of Chicago made it illegal to inquire about criminal history prior to the conclusion of the first interview or until after a conditional offer of employment is made (with some exceptions).
  • The City of Chicago places additional requirements on employers when a decision not to hire is made, based entirely or partially, on the applicants criminal history.
  • You should determine whether you have employees in the Chicago city limits.
  • If you do, review your employment application and the timing of your background checks with your lawyer.
Industry News
  ban  chicago

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.