Blog

 
     

District of Columbia Adopts Beyond-The-Box Legislation

By Michael Klazema on 8/22/2014

The District’s new ordinance restricts employers from asking about or requiring an applicant to disclose or reveal information about arrests or any criminal accusation (indictment, information, complaint or formal charge) made against the applicant which is not pending or did not result in a conviction. The Act goes beyond the box by requiring employers to first make a conditional offer of employment before asking about or requiring disclosure of a criminal conviction, and then by compelling them to show a legitimate business reason for withdrawing the conditional job offer.

Under the new ordinance, once an employer extends an offer of employment to the applicant, the employer can withdraw the offer or take adverse action against the applicant only for a legitimate business reason. In determining a legitimate business reason, the employer’s decision “must be reasonable” in light of the following factors:

  1. The specific duties and responsibilities of the job necessarily relate to the employment sought or held by the applicant;
  2. The bearing, if any, that the criminal offense for which the applicant was convicted will have on the applicant’s fitness or ability to perform one or more responsibilities of the job;  
  3. The time that has elapsed since the occurrence of the criminal offense;
  4. The frequency and seriousness of the criminal offense; and
  5. Any information produced by the applicant, or on behalf of the applicant, that relates to rehabilitation and good conduct since the occurrence of the criminal offense.

Any time an applicant believes that a conditional offer was withdrawn or that an adverse action was taken on the basis of a criminal conviction, he or she may make certain demands on the employer. The applicant may request within 30 days after the termination or adverse action, that the employer provide within 30 days a copy of all records that the employer obtained and/or considered in making its decision, including criminal records. In these cases, the employer is required to also send a notice that advises the applicant of his or her opportunity to file an administrative complaint with the Office of Human Rights.

The Act provides the Office of Human Rights with the exclusive remedy for violations under the ordinance. A person claiming to be aggrieved by a violation of the Act may file an administrative complaint with the Office of Human Rights. If the Commission finds that a violation has occurred, penalties may be assessed as follows for employers that employ:

  1. 11 to 30 employees, a fine of up to $1,000;
  2. 31 to 99 employees, a fine of up to $2,500;
  3. 100 or more employees, a fine of up to $5,000.

As we have been reporting on the past couple of years, ban-the-box legislation is rarely just about eliminating or banning the box that asks about criminal history from the job application form. It usually places more restrictions and obligations on employers, and grants specific rights and remedies to applicants and employees. We will continue to report on the different variations of “beyond-the-box” legislation as it is adopted.

You may access the District’s Bill 20-642 here: http://lims.dccouncil.us/_layouts/15/uploader/
Download.aspx?legislationid=30954&filename=B20-0642-Enrollment.pdf
 

Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • December 11 The Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General criticized a migrant youth detention center on the border for not running the proper background checks. Federal law requires the facility to screen all employees with FBI fingerprint checks.
  • December 06 In a bid to combat money laundering and illicit funding sources for terrorists flowing through the country's real estate sector, Singapore's government now mandates background checks for buyers purchasing properties prior to development.
  • December 04 What is a reference check? How does it vary from a work history check? We explore these questions and others.
  • December 04 Chicago Public Schools has dismissed hundreds of employees, coaches, vendors, and volunteers based on background check findings. The district recently vowed to re-check the majority of its 68,000 employees after a Chicago Tribune investigation revealed holes in its background check policies.
  • November 29 Striving to create a safer environment more conducive to productive training and leadership development, the Army has recently moved to adopt a uniform policy of background checks for certain roles. 
  • November 27 For hiring managers to verify the information provided on a resume, verification is essential.  Such is the purpose of employment history background checks.
  • November 27 California’s biggest public school district is waiving the cost of volunteer background checks. The move is meant to encourage more family - and community members to get involved with the school district.
  • November 22 Contractors play an important role in the workforce, delivering services to both individuals and organizations. Vetting contractors for suitability continues to be a challenge, as two recent articles prove.
  • November 21 When it comes to background and pre-employment checks, it can be instructive to look at the characteristics of the ten most massive U.S. employers.
  • November 21

    Verification checks are a powerful way to assess how truthful a job candidate has been on his or her application or resume. These checks can verify work history, education verification, professional licenses, and favorable personal qualities.