Blog

 
     

Illinois Bans the Box

By Michael Klazema on 6/6/2014

House Bill 5701 is cited as the “Job Opportunities for Qualified Applicants Act.” The Act prohibits any person or private entity that has 15 or more employees, and employment agencies, from inquiring about, considering, or requiring disclosure of the criminal record or criminal history of an applicant until after applicant is notified that he or she has been selected for an interview. If there is no interview, an inquiry may be made about criminal history only after the employer makes a conditional offer of employment to the applicant.

Exceptions to the restrictions include:

  1. Employers required to exclude applicants with certain criminal convictions from employment due to federal or state law;
  2. A fidelity bond or equivalent bond is required and an applicant’s conviction or one or more specified criminal offenses would disqualify the applicant from obtaining a bond. In this case, an employer may include a question or otherwise inquire whether the applicant has ever been convicted of any of those offenses; or
  3. Employers employ individuals licensed under the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) System Act.

The Act does not prohibit an employer from notifying applicants in writing of the specific offenses that will disqualify an applicant from employment in a particular position due to federal or state law or the employer’s policy. However, employers should proceed with caution because there are other laws and regulations to consider. For instance, it is a civil rights violation in the state for an employer to inquire about arrest or criminal history record information that has been expunged, sealed, or impounded, unless otherwise authorized by law.

The Illinois Department of Labor has authority for enforcement of the Act. The Department will issue a written warning for a first violation. The employer will have 30 days to remedy the violation. If the violation is not remedied within 30 days, or if a second violation occurs, the department may impose a civil penalty of up to $500. If the first violation is not remedied within 60 days, or for a third violation, the Director may impose an additional civil penalty of up to $1,500. Subsequent violations could result in additional civil penalties of up to $1,500 for every 30 days that passes.

House Bill 5701 (2014): http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/98/HB/PDF/09800HB5701lv.pdf


Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • June 20 Repeat background checks are becoming more common, with companies in India leading the charge. What does this trend look like, and how can employers embrace it now to stay ahead of the curve?
  • June 19

    Every federal job involves a background check of some kind. These background checks and how they are evaluated vary based on job, department, and security clearance level.


  • June 18

  • June 14 Ban the box laws aim to improve opportunities for employment. Could they have the opposite effect instead?
  • June 13 Jacobs Petroleum Products is a regional petroleum company that operates throughout Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Maryland. Apart from their employees carrying much responsibility and have frequent contact with customers, the company’s hiring also tends to be segmented since individual store managers are responsible for hiring talent for their own stores. In this employment landscape, Jacobs Petroleum Products needed a reliable and effective way to screen its new hires for criminal infractions and other red flags.
  • June 12

    The University of Wisconsin System may tweak its hiring and reference check processes. The potential changes come after one of UW’s assistant deans was accused of sexual harassment.


  • June 07 Stories of abuse by coaches in youth sports leagues continue to crop up around the country, but rules and guidelines remain patchy and enforcement is often lacking. The struggle to implement an effective system continues nationwide.
  • June 07 Financial background checks, usually referred to as credit history checks, can be an effective way to find out if a candidate is fit to handle accounts, financial data, and other assets at your business.
  • June 06 The Society for Human Resource Management and the Charles Koch Institute recently commissioned a survey to find out how willing employers were to hire people with criminal records. The study indicates that managers, HR professionals, and employees themselves are becoming more comfortable with the idea of hiring and working with ex-offenders.
  • June 04 Are fingerprint background checks the gold standard for employee screening, or are they overhyped? We look at some of the myths and misconceptions surrounding these checks.