Illinois Bans the Box

By Michael Klazema on 6/6/2014

House Bill 5701 is cited as the “Job Opportunities for Qualified Applicants Act.” The Act prohibits any person or private entity that has 15 or more employees, and employment agencies, from inquiring about, considering, or requiring disclosure of the criminal record or criminal history of an applicant until after applicant is notified that he or she has been selected for an interview. If there is no interview, an inquiry may be made about criminal history only after the employer makes a conditional offer of employment to the applicant.

Exceptions to the restrictions include:

  1. Employers required to exclude applicants with certain criminal convictions from employment due to federal or state law;
  2. A fidelity bond or equivalent bond is required and an applicant’s conviction or one or more specified criminal offenses would disqualify the applicant from obtaining a bond. In this case, an employer may include a question or otherwise inquire whether the applicant has ever been convicted of any of those offenses; or
  3. Employers employ individuals licensed under the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) System Act.

The Act does not prohibit an employer from notifying applicants in writing of the specific offenses that will disqualify an applicant from employment in a particular position due to federal or state law or the employer’s policy. However, employers should proceed with caution because there are other laws and regulations to consider. For instance, it is a civil rights violation in the state for an employer to inquire about arrest or criminal history record information that has been expunged, sealed, or impounded, unless otherwise authorized by law.

The Illinois Department of Labor has authority for enforcement of the Act. The Department will issue a written warning for a first violation. The employer will have 30 days to remedy the violation. If the violation is not remedied within 30 days, or if a second violation occurs, the department may impose a civil penalty of up to $500. If the first violation is not remedied within 60 days, or for a third violation, the Director may impose an additional civil penalty of up to $1,500. Subsequent violations could result in additional civil penalties of up to $1,500 for every 30 days that passes.

House Bill 5701 (2014):

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 22 Countrywide, states and local municipalities have committed to ban the box legislation, seeking to equalize opportunities in the job market for those with criminal histories.
  • March 22

    Thinking about becoming a firefighter? Here are some of the background check requirements you might face.

  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants.