Minnesota Bans the Box

By Michael Klazema on 7/26/2013

The Minnesota Governor signed legislation commonly known as “Ban the Box” this past May.  The bill becomes effective January 1, 2014.

Banning the box refers to the elimination of an inquiry into a person’s criminal history on a job application. This bill extends the limitations currently imposed on the public sector to include private employers.  Private employers will be prohibited from inquiring into or considering, or requiring disclosure of, the criminal record or criminal history of an applicant for employment until the applicant has been selected for an interview, or before a conditional offer of employment is made to the applicant.

Monetary remedies are established for violations of the law. The Commissioner of Human Rights may impose the following:

  1. For violations that occur before January 1, 2015, the penalties are as follows:
    1. A written warning is issued for the first violation that includes a notice the penalties for subsequent violations;
    2. If the first violation is not remedied within 30 days of the issuance of the warning, a fine of up to $500 may be imposed; and
    3. Subsequent violations are subject to a fine of up to $500 per violation, not to exceed $500 in a calendar year.
  2. For violations that occur after December 31, 2014, the penalties are as follows:
    1. For employers that employ ten or fewer persons at a site in the state, the penalty is up to $100 for each violation, not to exceed $100 in a calendar month;
    2. For employers that employ eleven to 20 persons at a site in the state, the penalty is up to $500 for each violation, not to exceed $500 in a calendar month;
    3. For employers that employ more than 20 persons at one or more sites in the state, the penalty is up to $500 for each violation, not to exceed $2,000 in a calendar month;

The remedies listed above are exclusive and private employers are not additionally liable for non-compliance with the law.

The bill does not exempt an employer from conducting a criminal history background investigation or consider criminal history record when there is a legal requirement to do so. It outlines other exemptions particular to certain types of employment such as law enforcement and fire protection agencies.


A copy of the bill is available at: SF523&version=2&session=ls88&session_year=2013&session_number=0&format=pdf


Industry News

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • December 04 Chicago Public Schools has dismissed hundreds of employees, coaches, vendors, and volunteers based on background check findings. The district recently vowed to re-check the majority of its 68,000 employees after a Chicago Tribune investigation revealed holes in its background check policies.
  • November 29 Striving to create a safer environment more conducive to productive training and leadership development, the Army has recently moved to adopt a uniform policy of background checks for certain roles. 
  • November 27 California’s biggest public school district is waiving the cost of volunteer background checks. The move is meant to encourage more family - and community members to get involved with the school district.
  • November 22 Contractors play an important role in the workforce, delivering services to both individuals and organizations. Vetting contractors for suitability continues to be a challenge, as two recent articles prove.
  • November 21 When it comes to background and pre-employment checks, it can be instructive to look at the characteristics of the ten most massive U.S. employers.
  • November 20 The #MeToo movement is bringing about legislative changes employers need to know about. We review some of the laws recently passed in California.
  • November 19

    Will a criminal conviction show up on your background check forever? In most states, there is a year limit for how long background check companies can report older criminal information.

  • November 15

    Replacing an inconsistent array of procedures, Ontario's government has passed into law a reform act intended to clarify how police departments should handle requests for information to be used in background checks. 

  • November 14 The federal government has vowed to cut its backlog of security clearance background checks in half by spring. Currently, the backlog is approximately 600,000 names strong.
  • November 12 To ensure the best hires, DFWSPF has implemented a stringent employee screening process—one that includes background searches through