Maryland Bans the Box for State Personnel

By Michael Klazema on 5/20/2013

The new legislation prohibits the judicial, executive, and legislative branches of the state government from inquiring into an applicant’s criminal record or criminal history until after the individual has been provided an opportunity for an interview. It does not prohibit the government from notifying an applicant for employment that certain prior criminal convictions may prohibit employment in some positions.

The ban does not apply to positions in the Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, or positions for which the hiring authority is required by law to conduct a criminal history records check.

The law becomes effective October 1, 2013 and remains in effect until June 30, 2018. The new law can be accessed here:

Legislation has not yet been passed that bans the box for Maryland’s private employment sector. However, the state’s Department of Labor has issued a guideline for pre-employment inquiries stating it is unlawful for an employer to make general inquiries into an applicant’s arrest or conviction record. But, inquiries about convictions which bear a direct relationship to the job and have not been expunged or sealed are lawful. See

Other restrictions placed on private employers are found in the state’s Criminal Procedure Code. Article 10-109 states an employer may not require disclosure of expunged information about criminal charges in an application, interview, or by other means. A person is not required to refer to or give information about an expunged charge when answering a question about a criminal charge that did not result in a conviction or was pardoned by the Governor. This article also states that refusal by a person to disclose information about criminal charges that have been expunged may not be the sole reason for an employer to discharge or refuse to hire a person.


Industry News

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • December 04 Chicago Public Schools has dismissed hundreds of employees, coaches, vendors, and volunteers based on background check findings. The district recently vowed to re-check the majority of its 68,000 employees after a Chicago Tribune investigation revealed holes in its background check policies.
  • November 29 Striving to create a safer environment more conducive to productive training and leadership development, the Army has recently moved to adopt a uniform policy of background checks for certain roles. 
  • November 27 California’s biggest public school district is waiving the cost of volunteer background checks. The move is meant to encourage more family - and community members to get involved with the school district.
  • November 22 Contractors play an important role in the workforce, delivering services to both individuals and organizations. Vetting contractors for suitability continues to be a challenge, as two recent articles prove.
  • November 21 When it comes to background and pre-employment checks, it can be instructive to look at the characteristics of the ten most massive U.S. employers.
  • November 20 The #MeToo movement is bringing about legislative changes employers need to know about. We review some of the laws recently passed in California.
  • November 19

    Will a criminal conviction show up on your background check forever? In most states, there is a year limit for how long background check companies can report older criminal information.

  • November 15

    Replacing an inconsistent array of procedures, Ontario's government has passed into law a reform act intended to clarify how police departments should handle requests for information to be used in background checks. 

  • November 14 The federal government has vowed to cut its backlog of security clearance background checks in half by spring. Currently, the backlog is approximately 600,000 names strong.
  • November 12 To ensure the best hires, DFWSPF has implemented a stringent employee screening process—one that includes background searches through