Washington, D.C. Restricts Employer Use of Credit Information for Employment Purposes

By Michael Klazema on 2/22/2017

The new law defines “credit information,” as any written, oral, or communication of information bearing on an employee’s creditworthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, or credit history. In addition, “inquire” means any direct or indirect conduct intended to gather credit information using any method, including application form, interviews, and credit history checks.

There are exceptions to this law. The prohibition does not apply:

  1. Where an employer is otherwise required by District law to require, request, suggest, or cause any employee to submit credit information, or use, accept, refer to, or inquire into an employee’s credit information;
  2. Where an employee is applying for a position as or is employed as a police officer with the Metropolitan Police Department;
  3. To the Office of the Chief Financial Officer of the District of Columbia;
  4. Where an employee is required to possess a security clearance under District law;
  5. To disclosures by District government employees of their credit information to the Board of Ethics and Government Accountability or the Office of the Inspector General, or to the use of such disclosures by those agencies;
  6. To financial institutions, where the position involves access to personal financial information; or
  7. Where an employer requests or receives credit information pursuant to the lawful subpoena, court order, or law enforcement investigation.

The Commission of Human Rights is charged with enforcing the new law. Employers who commit discriminatory practice or violate the law must pay the complainant:

  • $1,000 for first violation;
  • $2,500 for second violation; and
  • $5,000 for each subsequent violation.

The law will take effect after a 30-day period of congressional review and is accessible here for review:

What This Means to You:

  • Employers in Washington D.C. cannot ask about or use an applicant’s or employee’s credit information for most employment purposes (with some exceptions).
  • Employers who violate the law must pay the complainant $1,000 for first violation, $2,500 for second violation, and $5,000 for each subsequent violation.
  • The law will come into effect on March 17, 2017.
  • Employers should determine whether they obtain credit reports on D.C. employees; and if so, whether any exemption or federal pre-exemption applies; and, if not, remove credit reports from their background screening in D.C.

Employers with functions severely affected by this restriction should consider relocating those functions out of D.C.

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • December 04 Chicago Public Schools has dismissed hundreds of employees, coaches, vendors, and volunteers based on background check findings. The district recently vowed to re-check the majority of its 68,000 employees after a Chicago Tribune investigation revealed holes in its background check policies.
  • November 29 Striving to create a safer environment more conducive to productive training and leadership development, the Army has recently moved to adopt a uniform policy of background checks for certain roles. 
  • November 27 California’s biggest public school district is waiving the cost of volunteer background checks. The move is meant to encourage more family - and community members to get involved with the school district.
  • November 22 Contractors play an important role in the workforce, delivering services to both individuals and organizations. Vetting contractors for suitability continues to be a challenge, as two recent articles prove.
  • November 21 When it comes to background and pre-employment checks, it can be instructive to look at the characteristics of the ten most massive U.S. employers.
  • November 20 The #MeToo movement is bringing about legislative changes employers need to know about. We review some of the laws recently passed in California.
  • November 19

    Will a criminal conviction show up on your background check forever? In most states, there is a year limit for how long background check companies can report older criminal information.

  • November 15

    Replacing an inconsistent array of procedures, Ontario's government has passed into law a reform act intended to clarify how police departments should handle requests for information to be used in background checks. 

  • November 14 The federal government has vowed to cut its backlog of security clearance background checks in half by spring. Currently, the backlog is approximately 600,000 names strong.
  • November 12 To ensure the best hires, DFWSPF has implemented a stringent employee screening process—one that includes background searches through