Cook County, Illinois Limits Credit Checks for Employment Purposes

By Michael Klazema on 6/12/2015

In accordance with Ordinance 15-3088, employers, agents of an employer, and employment agencies must not:

  1. Fire, refuse to hire or recruit, discharge, or otherwise discriminate against any individual with respect to employment, classification, grading, discipline, selection for training and apprenticeship, compensation, or other term condition or privilege of employment because of an individual’s credit history or credit report;
  2. Inquire about an applicant or employee’s credit history; or
  3. Order or obtain an applicant or employee’s credit report from a consumer reporting agency.

Similar to the Illinois and Chicago laws, the County ordinance creates an exception to allow credit history to be considered when it is a bona fide occupational requirement, meaning:

  1. State or federal law requires bonding or other security for the position;
  2. Job duties include custody of or unsupervised access to cash or marketable assets valued at $2,500 or more;
  3. Job duties include signatory power over assets of $100 or more per transaction;
  4. The position is managerial and involves setting the direction or control of the business;
  5. The position involves access to limited categories of personal or confidential information, financial information, trade secrets, or state or national security information;
  6. The position meets federal or state rules establishing that credit history is a bona fide occupational requirement; or
  7. The employee or applicant’s credit history is required by or exempt under other laws.

The ordinance applies to anyone employing one or more employees, or seeking to employ one or more employees, if its principal place of business is in Cook County, or does business in Cook County. It applies to applicants for employment and any individual, whether paid or unpaid, who is engaged in the employment of an employer.  The ordinance defines “employment” to mean the performance of services for an employer: (1) for remuneration; (2) as a volunteer; or (3) as a participant in a training or apprenticeship program.

There are exemptions for government entities or organizations and certain private entities. Exemptions for the private entities include:

  1. Certain financial entities, including banks;
  2. Insurance or surety businesses authorized under Illinois law; and
  3. Debt collectors recognized under federal or state law or county ordinance.

The new ordinance is similar to the Illinois Employee Credit Privacy Act and the Chicago Human Rights Ordinance. Employers who are in compliance with those laws likely will be in compliance with Cook County’s new ordinance which went into effect on June 1, 2015.

What This Means For You:

  • Cook County, Illinois made it illegal to inquire about the credit history of an applicant or employee (with some exceptions).
  • You should determine whether you have employees in Cook County.  
  • If so, determine whether one of the exceptions in the law applies to you.
  • If exceptions do not apply, contact client relations to talk about setting up background screening packages without credit checks for Cook County positions.

Cook County Ordinance 15-3088: 
Illinois Employee Credit Privacy Act:

Chicago Municipal Code Sec. 2-160-053

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.