Mayor de Blasio Approves Restrictions on Employer Use of Credit History

By Michael Klazema on 5/20/2015

The ordinance applies to employers with four or more employees in New York City. It includes employers, labor organizations, employment agencies, and agents thereof. It also protects individuals employed as independent contractors that work for an employer’s business enterprise who are not themselves employers.

Employers are restricted from requesting or using information pertaining to an individual’s credit worthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, or payment history, as indicated by a consumer credit report, credit score, or information an employer obtains directly from the individual regarding details about credit accounts or bankruptcies, judgment, or liens. A consumer credit report includes any written or other communication of any information by a consumer reporting agency that bears on a consumer’s creditworthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, or credit history.

Exceptions to the new ordinance are as follows:

  1. An employer or its agent that is otherwise required by law to use an individual’s consumer credit history for employment purposes.
  2. Police or peace officers, or other positions with a law enforcement or investigative function at the department of investigation.
  3. Positions that are subject to background investigations by the department of investigation if the position is an appointed one in which a high degree of public trust has been reposed;
  4. Positions for which the law requires an employee to be bonded;
  5. Positions that require security clearance under federal or any state law;
  6. Non-clerical positions that have regular access to trade secrets, intelligence information, or national security information.
  7. Positions that have a signatory authority over third party funds or assets valued at $10,000 or more, or that involve a fiduciary responsibility to the employer with the authority to enter financial agreements valued at $10,000 or more on behalf of the employer;
  8. Positions with regular duties that allow the employee to modify digital security systems established to prevent the unauthorized use of the employer’s or client’s networks or databases; and
  9. Employers when responding to a subpoena, court order, or law enforcement investigation.

You can review's original compliance update on this subject dated April 24, 2015 here:

You can view New York City’s ordinance 261-A here:

What This Means for You:

  • Determine whether you have positions in New York City for which you run credit checks.
  • If so, determine whether one of the exceptions in the law applies to you.
  • If not, contact your account manager to talk about setting up background screening packages without credit checks for New York City positions.

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.