Colorado Amends Law Limiting Credit Reports

By Michael Klazema on 4/10/2014

The Act restricts an employer’s use of consumer credit information for employment purposes unless the information contained in the report is “substantially related to the employee’s current or potential job.” “Substantially related to the employee’s current or potential job” means information that is related to the position because it is either an executive or management position, or it is professional staff to executive or management personnel and involves certain characteristics. Senate Bill 14-102 expands that definition to include banks and financial institutions.

Therefore, under Colorado’s Employment Opportunity Act, employers are permitted to use consumer credit information for employment purposes if the positions applied for are:

  1. An executive or management position;
  2. Professional staff to executive or management personnel and involves one or more of the following:
  3. setting the direction or control of a business, division, unit, or an agency of a business;
  4. a fiduciary responsibility to the employer;
  5. access to customers', employees', or the employer's personal or financial information other than information customarily provided in a retail transaction;
  6. The authority to issue payments, collect debts, or enter into contracts; or
  7. With a bank or financial institution.

This amendment became effective upon passage on March 27, 2014.

Senate Bill 14-102 is available here:
0254E4E9E607A65787257C5B0072F96C?Open&file=102_enr.pdf Legislation and Compliance Update of April 29, 2013 is available here:

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • June 20 Repeat background checks are becoming more common, with companies in India leading the charge. What does this trend look like, and how can employers embrace it now to stay ahead of the curve?
  • June 19

    Every federal job involves a background check of some kind. These background checks and how they are evaluated vary based on job, department, and security clearance level.

  • June 18

  • June 14 Ban the box laws aim to improve opportunities for employment. Could they have the opposite effect instead?
  • June 13 Jacobs Petroleum Products is a regional petroleum company that operates throughout Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Maryland. Apart from their employees carrying much responsibility and have frequent contact with customers, the company’s hiring also tends to be segmented since individual store managers are responsible for hiring talent for their own stores. In this employment landscape, Jacobs Petroleum Products needed a reliable and effective way to screen its new hires for criminal infractions and other red flags.
  • June 12

    The University of Wisconsin System may tweak its hiring and reference check processes. The potential changes come after one of UW’s assistant deans was accused of sexual harassment.

  • June 07 Stories of abuse by coaches in youth sports leagues continue to crop up around the country, but rules and guidelines remain patchy and enforcement is often lacking. The struggle to implement an effective system continues nationwide.
  • June 07 Financial background checks, usually referred to as credit history checks, can be an effective way to find out if a candidate is fit to handle accounts, financial data, and other assets at your business.
  • June 06 The Society for Human Resource Management and the Charles Koch Institute recently commissioned a survey to find out how willing employers were to hire people with criminal records. The study indicates that managers, HR professionals, and employees themselves are becoming more comfortable with the idea of hiring and working with ex-offenders.
  • June 04 Are fingerprint background checks the gold standard for employee screening, or are they overhyped? We look at some of the myths and misconceptions surrounding these checks.