Blog

 
     

Colorado Amends Law Limiting Credit Reports

By Michael Klazema on 4/10/2014

The Act restricts an employer’s use of consumer credit information for employment purposes unless the information contained in the report is “substantially related to the employee’s current or potential job.” “Substantially related to the employee’s current or potential job” means information that is related to the position because it is either an executive or management position, or it is professional staff to executive or management personnel and involves certain characteristics. Senate Bill 14-102 expands that definition to include banks and financial institutions.

Therefore, under Colorado’s Employment Opportunity Act, employers are permitted to use consumer credit information for employment purposes if the positions applied for are:

  1. An executive or management position;
  2. Professional staff to executive or management personnel and involves one or more of the following:
  3. setting the direction or control of a business, division, unit, or an agency of a business;
  4. a fiduciary responsibility to the employer;
  5. access to customers', employees', or the employer's personal or financial information other than information customarily provided in a retail transaction;
  6. The authority to issue payments, collect debts, or enter into contracts; or
  7. With a bank or financial institution.

This amendment became effective upon passage on March 27, 2014.

Senate Bill 14-102 is available here: http://www.leg.state.co.us/Clics/CLICS2014A/csl.nsf/fsbillcont3/
0254E4E9E607A65787257C5B0072F96C?Open&file=102_enr.pdf

backgroundchecks.com Legislation and Compliance Update of April 29, 2013 is available here: http://www.backgroundbiz.com/compliance/complianceupdate_04292013.html.

Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • December 04 Chicago Public Schools has dismissed hundreds of employees, coaches, vendors, and volunteers based on background check findings. The district recently vowed to re-check the majority of its 68,000 employees after a Chicago Tribune investigation revealed holes in its background check policies.
  • November 29 Striving to create a safer environment more conducive to productive training and leadership development, the Army has recently moved to adopt a uniform policy of background checks for certain roles. 
  • November 27 California’s biggest public school district is waiving the cost of volunteer background checks. The move is meant to encourage more family - and community members to get involved with the school district.
  • November 22 Contractors play an important role in the workforce, delivering services to both individuals and organizations. Vetting contractors for suitability continues to be a challenge, as two recent articles prove.
  • November 21 When it comes to background and pre-employment checks, it can be instructive to look at the characteristics of the ten most massive U.S. employers.
  • November 20 The #MeToo movement is bringing about legislative changes employers need to know about. We review some of the laws recently passed in California.
  • November 19

    Will a criminal conviction show up on your background check forever? In most states, there is a year limit for how long background check companies can report older criminal information.


  • November 15

    Replacing an inconsistent array of procedures, Ontario's government has passed into law a reform act intended to clarify how police departments should handle requests for information to be used in background checks. 


  • November 14 The federal government has vowed to cut its backlog of security clearance background checks in half by spring. Currently, the backlog is approximately 600,000 names strong.
  • November 12 To ensure the best hires, DFWSPF has implemented a stringent employee screening process—one that includes background searches through backgroundchecks.com.