Senate Bill Limiting Credit Reports Proposed

By Michael Klazema on 1/13/2014

If passed, Senate Bill 1837 would prohibit employers from asking employees and prospective employees about their credit histories or from obtaining that information from a consumer or credit report. Employers would not be permitted to use, or cause to be procured, a consumer report or investigative consumer report with information on a consumer’s creditworthiness, credit standing, or credit capacity. The prohibition would apply when the information is used for employment purposes or when an employment-related adverse action is taken. The prohibition would apply even if the consumer consents to or otherwise authorizes the procurement or use of a consumer report for employment purposes or in connection with an employment-related adverse action.

There are two exceptions in the bill. An employer may use a consumer report when (1) the consumer applies for, or currently holds, employment that requires national security clearance, or (2) it is otherwise required by law.

Senate Bill 1837 is very similar to House Bill 645 that was initially filed by Representative Steve Cohen in February 2013. The only difference is House Bill 645 allows for additional exceptions. Employers would not be prohibited from inquiring about credit histories when the consumer applies for or holds:

  • employment that requires FDIC clearance;
  • employment with a State or local government that otherwise requires a consumer report; or
  • a supervisory, managerial, professional, or executive position at a financial institution.

This type of legislation is a growing trend at the state level. In 2013, Colorado and Nevada passed legislation restricting employers’ use of credit information. States with similar laws include California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington. There are four states that are currently considering similar legislation, and another three states have already pre-filed legislation for consideration in 2014. will continue to monitor and report on this trend going forward.

A copy of Senate Bill 1837 is available here:

A copy of's report on Colorado legislation is available here:

A copy of's report on Nevada legislation is available here:

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 22 Countrywide, states and local municipalities have committed to ban the box legislation, seeking to equalize opportunities in the job market for those with criminal histories.
  • March 22

    Thinking about becoming a firefighter? Here are some of the background check requirements you might face.

  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants.