Nevada Restricts Employers’ Use of Consumer Credit Reports or Other Credit Information

By Michael Klazema on 6/4/2013

The legislation prohibits employers from:

  1. Requiring an employee or prospective employee to submit to a credit report or other credit information as a condition of employment.
  2. Using, accepting, referring to, or inquiring about a consumer credit report or other credit information.
  3. Taking or threatening adverse action against a person who refuses to submit to a consumer credit report.
  4. Taking or threatening adverse employment action based on an individual’s consumer credit report or other credit information.
  5. Taking or threatening adverse action against an employee or prospective employee in retaliation for exercising his or her rights or the rights of another person. This includes filing a complaint or a legal proceeding, or testifying in a legal proceeding.

The law applies to both private and public employers in the State of Nevada, with few exceptions. Employers may request or consider consumer credit report or other credit information for employment purposes only if it is required or authorized to do so by a state or federal law. Credit information may also be considered if an employer reasonably believes that an employee or applicant has engaged in activity which may constitute a violation of a state or federal law. The final exception to this new law is the credit information must be “job related.” To apply this exception, the duties of the position must involve:

  1. Responsibility for financial assets or employment with a financial institution;
  2. Access to confidential or proprietary information;
  3. Managerial or supervisory responsibility;
  4. Direct exercise of law enforcement authority as a government employee;
  5. Responsibility for or access to another person’s financial information; or
  6. Employment with a licensed gaming establishment.

If an employer violates the new law, civil remedies include the right of employment for prospective employees, and the right of reinstatement or promotion for employees. The employer may also be assessed lost wages and benefits, as well as reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees. The new law allows enforcement by way of a class action.

The law also allows the state’s Labor Commissioner to impose administrative penalties of up to $9,000 per violation and to bring an action for an injunction requiring compliance with the law.

Other states with similar legislation are California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington.

This new legislation may be accessed here:

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • June 20 Repeat background checks are becoming more common, with companies in India leading the charge. What does this trend look like, and how can employers embrace it now to stay ahead of the curve?
  • June 19

    Every federal job involves a background check of some kind. These background checks and how they are evaluated vary based on job, department, and security clearance level.

  • June 18

  • June 14 Ban the box laws aim to improve opportunities for employment. Could they have the opposite effect instead?
  • June 13 Jacobs Petroleum Products is a regional petroleum company that operates throughout Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Maryland. Apart from their employees carrying much responsibility and have frequent contact with customers, the company’s hiring also tends to be segmented since individual store managers are responsible for hiring talent for their own stores. In this employment landscape, Jacobs Petroleum Products needed a reliable and effective way to screen its new hires for criminal infractions and other red flags.
  • June 12

    The University of Wisconsin System may tweak its hiring and reference check processes. The potential changes come after one of UW’s assistant deans was accused of sexual harassment.

  • June 07 Stories of abuse by coaches in youth sports leagues continue to crop up around the country, but rules and guidelines remain patchy and enforcement is often lacking. The struggle to implement an effective system continues nationwide.
  • June 07 Financial background checks, usually referred to as credit history checks, can be an effective way to find out if a candidate is fit to handle accounts, financial data, and other assets at your business.
  • June 06 The Society for Human Resource Management and the Charles Koch Institute recently commissioned a survey to find out how willing employers were to hire people with criminal records. The study indicates that managers, HR professionals, and employees themselves are becoming more comfortable with the idea of hiring and working with ex-offenders.
  • June 04 Are fingerprint background checks the gold standard for employee screening, or are they overhyped? We look at some of the myths and misconceptions surrounding these checks.