Blog

 
     

California Restricts Employers’ Use of E-Verify

By Michael Klazema on 9/24/2015

The new law (Cal. Labor Code § 2814) will make it unlawful for an employer to use the federal electronic-employment verification system known as E-Verify to check the employment authorization status of an existing employee or an applicant who has not been offered employment at a time or in a manner that (a) is not required by federal law or (b) is not authorized under any federal agency memorandum of understanding governing the use of the E-Verify system.

According to the legislation, employers are permitted to use the E-Verify system only:

  1. When an offer of employment has been made; or
  2. When:
    1. The use of the E-Verify system is done in accordance with 8 U.S.C. § 1324a which allows E-Verify screening only when hiring, recruiting, or referring for employment; and
    2. It is authorized under a federal agency memorandum of understanding governing the use of the E-Verify system; or
  3. When required by federal law; or
  4. When it is a condition of receiving federal funds.

The law also places certain requirements on employers when a tentative non-confirmation is issued by the Social Security Administration or the United States Department of Homeland Security indicating that the information entered in E-Verify did not match federal records. In these cases, employers must comply with the required employee notification procedures under any memorandum of understanding governing the use of the E-Verify system. Employers must also furnish the employee any notification issued by the agencies containing information specific to the E-Verify case or any tentative non-confirmation notice, as soon as practicable.

Penalties for violations of the law are significant. An employer could be assessed civil penalties up to $10,000 for each violation. Each unlawful use of the E-Verify system on an employee or applicant constitutes a separate violation.

What This Means to You:

  • California is placing restrictions, requirements, and severe penalties on employers when using the federal E-Verify system.
  • You should determine if you have employees in California.
  • If you do, train employees who are responsible for using the E-Verify system to comply with these state restrictions and requirements.

California Assembly Bill 622 is available here for review: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/15-16/bill/asm/ab_0601-0650/ab_622_bill_20150909_enrolled.pdf


Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • April 19

    In a post-Penn State scandal world, universities are more aware than ever of the need to protect students by vetting faculty. The extent of this vetting and its implementation are hot topics causing controversy on campuses nationwide.


  • April 18 Amazon’s criminal background checks look back seven years and consider any convictions from that time. All finalists must complete criminal background searches, reference checks, and drug tests.
  • April 17

    From entry-level positions to roles involving “Top Secret” security clearances, military roles can involve a variety of different background investigations. We look at what different types of military background checks entail.


  • April 17 A new CNBC series is looking at true HR stories and their lessons. The most recent installment looked at the consequences of not running background checks.
  • April 12 Complicated by patchwork legislation and continuing federal prohibition, marijuana legalization poses several challenges for employers and would-be employees alike. Despite its legal status in a growing number of states, marijuana continues to negatively impact job-seekers.
  • April 12 Familiarizing yourself with the legality of background checks is essential. Continue reading about laws and regulations.
  • April 11

    Understanding the background check obligations in your industry and state.

  • April 10 A former employee of a senior assisted living community is facing charges for stealing from a resident. The alleged theft occurred after the employee gained access to the patient’s credit cards and checking account.
  • April 06 Background checks aren’t pass or fail. Employers consider various factors before making any hiring decision based on background check data.
  • April 06  Level 1 and Level 2 are terms used in Florida law to describe background check requirements for employers. We look at what a Level 2 background check entails.