Blog

 
     

California Restricts Employers’ Use of E-Verify

By Michael Klazema on 9/24/2015

The new law (Cal. Labor Code § 2814) will make it unlawful for an employer to use the federal electronic-employment verification system known as E-Verify to check the employment authorization status of an existing employee or an applicant who has not been offered employment at a time or in a manner that (a) is not required by federal law or (b) is not authorized under any federal agency memorandum of understanding governing the use of the E-Verify system.

According to the legislation, employers are permitted to use the E-Verify system only:

  1. When an offer of employment has been made; or
  2. When:
    1. The use of the E-Verify system is done in accordance with 8 U.S.C. § 1324a which allows E-Verify screening only when hiring, recruiting, or referring for employment; and
    2. It is authorized under a federal agency memorandum of understanding governing the use of the E-Verify system; or
  3. When required by federal law; or
  4. When it is a condition of receiving federal funds.

The law also places certain requirements on employers when a tentative non-confirmation is issued by the Social Security Administration or the United States Department of Homeland Security indicating that the information entered in E-Verify did not match federal records. In these cases, employers must comply with the required employee notification procedures under any memorandum of understanding governing the use of the E-Verify system. Employers must also furnish the employee any notification issued by the agencies containing information specific to the E-Verify case or any tentative non-confirmation notice, as soon as practicable.

Penalties for violations of the law are significant. An employer could be assessed civil penalties up to $10,000 for each violation. Each unlawful use of the E-Verify system on an employee or applicant constitutes a separate violation.

What This Means to You:

  • California is placing restrictions, requirements, and severe penalties on employers when using the federal E-Verify system.
  • You should determine if you have employees in California.
  • If you do, train employees who are responsible for using the E-Verify system to comply with these state restrictions and requirements.

California Assembly Bill 622 is available here for review: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/15-16/bill/asm/ab_0601-0650/ab_622_bill_20150909_enrolled.pdf


Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • July 17 — Hourly Employee Screening: What Makes It Unique and Important infographic?Modern employers conduct background checks on most of the people they hire. These checks are most often used to screen full-time salaried workers. Part-timers and hourly employees are typically less likely to face a thorough background check or even go through a background screening at all. According to a survey conducted by HR.com, 67 percent of employers screen all of their part-time employees, compared to 83 percent of their full-time employees.
  • July 17 A Kentucky school district recently decided to stop paying for volunteer background checks. Going forward, volunteers will be expected to cover the cost of their own checks, which is $10 per person.
  • July 12 Seeking fresh employees for businesses, some states seek to reduce the number of people denied employment based on old or nonviolent crimes.
  • July 11 Multinational aerospace company - Safran Group - trusts backgroundchecks.com to screen new hires, The products they manufacture can have major implications for aircraft safety and worldwide security. As such, the company needs to be extremely careful and deliberate about who it trusts to join the organization.
  • July 11 Recently cited for driving too fast? Here’s what a speeding ticket will do to your background check report.
  • July 10

    Could your business be vulnerable to employee theft? Protect yourself with more thorough background checks.


  • July 09 While Social Security Numbers aren’t required for criminal history checks, they can be beneficial. Here’s why.
  • July 05

    In June, Chicago Public Schools came under fire after a Chicago Tribune piece accused the district of not protecting students from sexual abusers. The district has announced plans to run background checks on all employees.


  • July 04 — How important are volunteer background checks? Do they even matter?
    Organizations that rely in part on volunteer labor consistently find themselves asking these questions. The assumption is usually that volunteer background checks are less important than background checks for full-time or part-time employees. According to a CareerBuilder survey from 2016, 72 percent of employers conduct background checks on all employees. A parallel statistic isn’t even available for volunteer checks. They are less common – and less valued.
  • July 03 #MeToo harassment allegations continue to reshape workplaces in every industry. As a result, many companies are looking to safeguard themselves from liability.