Blog

 
     

Justice Department Settles E-Verify Violations with Janitorial Services Company

By Michael Klazema on 11/2/2012

The Justice Department recently announced that it reached an agreement with a janitorial and facilities maintenance services company based in Florida resolving an employee's anti-discrimination allegations under the Immigration and Nationality Act, which is the law that governs E-Verify use.

The employee claimed that the company failed to provide proper notice and instructions for contesting an initial data mismatch (that is, the tentative non-confirmation) in E-Verify. The employee visited the Social Security Administration but did not receive the “Referral to the Social Security Administration” letter from the employer to take along. E-Verify provided a final result of a “final non-confirmation” stating that the employee was not legally eligible to work in the U.S. After receiving the final non-confirmation response from E-Verify, the company terminated the employee’s employment and the employee contacted the E-Verify hotline for help. An E-Verify agent notified the employer that the employee was authorized to work, but the company did not reinstate the employee.

The Immigration and Nationality Act protects employees from discriminatory practices in the employment eligibility verification process, including E-Verify, and prohibits employers from retaliating against individuals who assert their rights or oppose a practice that is illegal under that law. The settlement agreement between the Justice Department and the company requires the company to pay $6,800 in monetary relief along with a $2,000 civil penalty to the employee. The company has also agreed to training by the Department of Homeland Security on proper E-Verify procedures and the Justice Department on the anti-discrimination provision of the law.


Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • April 19

    In a post-Penn State scandal world, universities are more aware than ever of the need to protect students by vetting faculty. The extent of this vetting and its implementation are hot topics causing controversy on campuses nationwide.


  • April 18 Amazon’s criminal background checks look back seven years and consider any convictions from that time. All finalists must complete criminal background searches, reference checks, and drug tests.
  • April 17

    From entry-level positions to roles involving “Top Secret” security clearances, military roles can involve a variety of different background investigations. We look at what different types of military background checks entail.


  • April 17 A new CNBC series is looking at true HR stories and their lessons. The most recent installment looked at the consequences of not running background checks.
  • April 12 Complicated by patchwork legislation and continuing federal prohibition, marijuana legalization poses several challenges for employers and would-be employees alike. Despite its legal status in a growing number of states, marijuana continues to negatively impact job-seekers.
  • April 12 Familiarizing yourself with the legality of background checks is essential. Continue reading about laws and regulations.
  • April 11

    Understanding the background check obligations in your industry and state.

  • April 10 A former employee of a senior assisted living community is facing charges for stealing from a resident. The alleged theft occurred after the employee gained access to the patient’s credit cards and checking account.
  • April 06 Background checks aren’t pass or fail. Employers consider various factors before making any hiring decision based on background check data.
  • April 06  Level 1 and Level 2 are terms used in Florida law to describe background check requirements for employers. We look at what a Level 2 background check entails.