Justice Department Settles E-Verify Violations with Janitorial Services Company

By Michael Klazema on 11/2/2012

The Justice Department recently announced that it reached an agreement with a janitorial and facilities maintenance services company based in Florida resolving an employee's anti-discrimination allegations under the Immigration and Nationality Act, which is the law that governs E-Verify use.

The employee claimed that the company failed to provide proper notice and instructions for contesting an initial data mismatch (that is, the tentative non-confirmation) in E-Verify. The employee visited the Social Security Administration but did not receive the “Referral to the Social Security Administration” letter from the employer to take along. E-Verify provided a final result of a “final non-confirmation” stating that the employee was not legally eligible to work in the U.S. After receiving the final non-confirmation response from E-Verify, the company terminated the employee’s employment and the employee contacted the E-Verify hotline for help. An E-Verify agent notified the employer that the employee was authorized to work, but the company did not reinstate the employee.

The Immigration and Nationality Act protects employees from discriminatory practices in the employment eligibility verification process, including E-Verify, and prohibits employers from retaliating against individuals who assert their rights or oppose a practice that is illegal under that law. The settlement agreement between the Justice Department and the company requires the company to pay $6,800 in monetary relief along with a $2,000 civil penalty to the employee. The company has also agreed to training by the Department of Homeland Security on proper E-Verify procedures and the Justice Department on the anti-discrimination provision of the law.

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • July 17 — Hourly Employee Screening: What Makes It Unique and Important infographic?Modern employers conduct background checks on most of the people they hire. These checks are most often used to screen full-time salaried workers. Part-timers and hourly employees are typically less likely to face a thorough background check or even go through a background screening at all. According to a survey conducted by, 67 percent of employers screen all of their part-time employees, compared to 83 percent of their full-time employees.
  • July 17 A Kentucky school district recently decided to stop paying for volunteer background checks. Going forward, volunteers will be expected to cover the cost of their own checks, which is $10 per person.
  • July 12 Seeking fresh employees for businesses, some states seek to reduce the number of people denied employment based on old or nonviolent crimes.
  • July 11 Multinational aerospace company - Safran Group - trusts to screen new hires, The products they manufacture can have major implications for aircraft safety and worldwide security. As such, the company needs to be extremely careful and deliberate about who it trusts to join the organization.
  • July 11 Recently cited for driving too fast? Here’s what a speeding ticket will do to your background check report.
  • July 10

    Could your business be vulnerable to employee theft? Protect yourself with more thorough background checks.

  • July 09 While Social Security Numbers aren’t required for criminal history checks, they can be beneficial. Here’s why.
  • July 05

    In June, Chicago Public Schools came under fire after a Chicago Tribune piece accused the district of not protecting students from sexual abusers. The district has announced plans to run background checks on all employees.

  • July 04 — How important are volunteer background checks? Do they even matter?
    Organizations that rely in part on volunteer labor consistently find themselves asking these questions. The assumption is usually that volunteer background checks are less important than background checks for full-time or part-time employees. According to a CareerBuilder survey from 2016, 72 percent of employers conduct background checks on all employees. A parallel statistic isn’t even available for volunteer checks. They are less common – and less valued.
  • July 03 #MeToo harassment allegations continue to reshape workplaces in every industry. As a result, many companies are looking to safeguard themselves from liability.