Blog

 
     

OFCCP Directs Federal Contractors to Comply with EEOC Criminal History Guidance

By Michael Klazema on 2/8/2013

On January 31, 2013, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) issued a directive providing information to federal contractors and subcontractors and federally-assisted construction contractors and subcontractors (contractors) as well as OFCCP personnel about complying with federal non-discrimination laws.

This directive gives notice that the OFCCP adopts the enforcement guidelines established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) on the use of arrest and conviction records in employment decisions on April 25, 2012. It contends that although individuals with criminal history records are not a protected group under the Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964, antidiscrimination laws may be violated when criminal records are being considered because it may lead to a disparate adverse impact on members of protected groups.

The OFCCP warns against (i) excluding people from employment based on the mere existence of a criminal history record that do not take into account other factors; (ii) placing job announcements that categorically exclude people who have any kind of conviction or arrest and of contractors that screen out job seekers with criminal records by stating that they will only accept applicants with so-called "clean" criminal records; and (iii) screening and refusing to make referrals because an applicant has a criminal history record. Covered entities are encouraged to analyze their policies and practices to ensure compliance with the guidelines.

The EEOC guidance states certain factors must be considered to determine whether criminal history information is relevant to an exclusion of employment. In determining whether criminal history information is "job related and consistent with business necessity," the employer must consider:
(a)  the nature and gravity of the offense or conduct;
(b)  the time that has passed since the offense, conduct and/or completion of the sentence; and
(c)  The nature of the job held or sought.

Additionally, the EEOC guidance strongly recommends that employers offer applicants an individualized assessment process through which they can provide additional information about the risks that they would pose to the employer.

The OFCCP also recommends other EEOC best practices, such as removing questions from applications that ask applicants to disclose their criminal history.

Finally, the OFCCP references the Employment and Training Administration’s (ETA) Guidance Letter dated May 25, 2012. The ETA’s letter is intended to help covered entities comply with their nondiscrimination obligations when serving the population of individuals with criminal records, and to ensure that exclusionary policies are not in violation of federal guidelines.

The OFCCP directive is effective immediately.

For more information, you may directly access:
OFCCP Directive No. 302: http://www.dol.gov/ofccp/regs/compliance/directives/dir306.htm 
EEOC’s Enforcement Guidelines: http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/arrest_conviction.cfm 
ETA’s Guidance Letter: http://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/attach/TEGL/TEGL_31_11_acc.pdf

backgroundchecks.com’s general counsel hosts a free webinar every other month on how to comply with the EEOC’s guidance. You can sign up for the webinar at: http://www.backgroundbiz.com/campaigns/2012-CCEEO-Webinar-Invitation.html


Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • July 17 — Hourly Employee Screening: What Makes It Unique and Important infographic?Modern employers conduct background checks on most of the people they hire. These checks are most often used to screen full-time salaried workers. Part-timers and hourly employees are typically less likely to face a thorough background check or even go through a background screening at all. According to a survey conducted by HR.com, 67 percent of employers screen all of their part-time employees, compared to 83 percent of their full-time employees.
  • July 17 A Kentucky school district recently decided to stop paying for volunteer background checks. Going forward, volunteers will be expected to cover the cost of their own checks, which is $10 per person.
  • July 12 Seeking fresh employees for businesses, some states seek to reduce the number of people denied employment based on old or nonviolent crimes.
  • July 11 Multinational aerospace company - Safran Group - trusts backgroundchecks.com to screen new hires, The products they manufacture can have major implications for aircraft safety and worldwide security. As such, the company needs to be extremely careful and deliberate about who it trusts to join the organization.
  • July 11 Recently cited for driving too fast? Here’s what a speeding ticket will do to your background check report.
  • July 10

    Could your business be vulnerable to employee theft? Protect yourself with more thorough background checks.


  • July 09 While Social Security Numbers aren’t required for criminal history checks, they can be beneficial. Here’s why.
  • July 05

    In June, Chicago Public Schools came under fire after a Chicago Tribune piece accused the district of not protecting students from sexual abusers. The district has announced plans to run background checks on all employees.


  • July 04 — How important are volunteer background checks? Do they even matter?
    Organizations that rely in part on volunteer labor consistently find themselves asking these questions. The assumption is usually that volunteer background checks are less important than background checks for full-time or part-time employees. According to a CareerBuilder survey from 2016, 72 percent of employers conduct background checks on all employees. A parallel statistic isn’t even available for volunteer checks. They are less common – and less valued.
  • July 03 #MeToo harassment allegations continue to reshape workplaces in every industry. As a result, many companies are looking to safeguard themselves from liability.