Blog

 
     

Missouri Modifies the Employment Disqualification List for Home Care Employees

By Michael Klazema on 7/31/2013

Missouri Senate Bill 127 was recently signed by the Governor. The legislation amends several sections of the existing law that pertain to public medical assistance, the state’s HealthNet eligibility, and other public health services. This update looks at the amendments affecting home health agencies as defined in Missouri Revised Statutes 197-400. The definition includes public agencies and private organizations.

Missouri Revised Statutes Section 660.315 is amended so that employers will not be held liable under state law for denying or terminating employment if required to do so by law. An employer may deny or terminate employment because of information obtained through the state-mandated background screening and employment eligibility determination process if the employee:

  1. Has been found guilty, pled guilty, or pled nolo contendere in Missouri or been found guilty of a crime in any state which if committed in Missouri would be a class A or B felony violation of certain specified crimes such as offenses against the persons, sexual offenses, and robbery or burglary offenses;
  2. Was placed on the employee disqualification list maintained by the Department of Health and Senior Services, after the date of hire;
  3. Was placed on the employee disqualification list maintained by the Department of Mental Health, after the date of hire;
  4. Is listed on any of the background check lists in the Family Care Safety Registry; or
  5. Has a disqualifying finding or was denied a good cause waiver under the employee disqualification list maintained by the Department of Health and Senior Services. 
    The bill also stipulates that an employer will not be charged with unemployment insurance benefits if it terminates employment for the stated reasons.

The effective date of the new legislation is August 28, 2013.

A copy of the new law is available here: http://legiscan.com/MO/text/SB127/id/850673/Missouri-2013-SB127-Enrolled.pdf


Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • October 11 Sporting organizations have long maintained lists of people barred for misconduct. A new agency wants to collect those names into a publicly searchable database.
  • October 09 In July, Ohio Governor John Kasich signed an executive order requiring criminal background checks for all Medicaid providers. Some healthcare professionals, particularly counsellors to drug addicts, worry the new rule could cost them their jobs.
  • October 05 After a city in Georgia adopted ban the box rules to increase fairness in hiring, unforeseen conflicts with additional city regulations rendered the change ineffective. The city must now find a fix. 
  • October 04 Whether you are applying for a job that involves driving or renewing your car insurance policy, your driving record can have an impact on what comes next. At backgroundchecks.com, we offer a way to check the accuracy of your record.
  • October 03 What should employers expect to see on criminal history reports, and what should job seekers expect these checks to reveal? We take a look at what shows up on criminal background checks.
  • October 02 Employers across the country are becoming more open to hiring people with criminal records. The reasons behind the shift range from new laws to the state of the job market.
  • October 01 Insurance points can affect how much you pay for your auto insurance policy. How are these points assessed and what do you need to know about them?
  • September 28 A driver’s license check includes more than just details about moving violations. Here’s what to expect if an employer or insurance provider pulls your driving record.
  • September 28

    Your driving record can impact your car insurance rates—and coverage options—in several ways. Learn how insurance companies use motor vehicle records to adjust their rates.


  • September 27 — With an aging population, long-term in-home care options are becoming more popular. In many cases, state governments have failed to provide thorough vetting procedures, leading to incidents of harm.