Missouri Modifies the Employment Disqualification List for Home Care Employees

By Michael Klazema on 7/31/2013

Missouri Senate Bill 127 was recently signed by the Governor. The legislation amends several sections of the existing law that pertain to public medical assistance, the state’s HealthNet eligibility, and other public health services. This update looks at the amendments affecting home health agencies as defined in Missouri Revised Statutes 197-400. The definition includes public agencies and private organizations.

Missouri Revised Statutes Section 660.315 is amended so that employers will not be held liable under state law for denying or terminating employment if required to do so by law. An employer may deny or terminate employment because of information obtained through the state-mandated background screening and employment eligibility determination process if the employee:

  1. Has been found guilty, pled guilty, or pled nolo contendere in Missouri or been found guilty of a crime in any state which if committed in Missouri would be a class A or B felony violation of certain specified crimes such as offenses against the persons, sexual offenses, and robbery or burglary offenses;
  2. Was placed on the employee disqualification list maintained by the Department of Health and Senior Services, after the date of hire;
  3. Was placed on the employee disqualification list maintained by the Department of Mental Health, after the date of hire;
  4. Is listed on any of the background check lists in the Family Care Safety Registry; or
  5. Has a disqualifying finding or was denied a good cause waiver under the employee disqualification list maintained by the Department of Health and Senior Services. 
    The bill also stipulates that an employer will not be charged with unemployment insurance benefits if it terminates employment for the stated reasons.

The effective date of the new legislation is August 28, 2013.

A copy of the new law is available here:

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • April 19

    In a post-Penn State scandal world, universities are more aware than ever of the need to protect students by vetting faculty. The extent of this vetting and its implementation are hot topics causing controversy on campuses nationwide.

  • April 18 Amazon’s criminal background checks look back seven years and consider any convictions from that time. All finalists must complete criminal background searches, reference checks, and drug tests.
  • April 17

    From entry-level positions to roles involving “Top Secret” security clearances, military roles can involve a variety of different background investigations. We look at what different types of military background checks entail.

  • April 17 A new CNBC series is looking at true HR stories and their lessons. The most recent installment looked at the consequences of not running background checks.
  • April 12 Complicated by patchwork legislation and continuing federal prohibition, marijuana legalization poses several challenges for employers and would-be employees alike. Despite its legal status in a growing number of states, marijuana continues to negatively impact job-seekers.
  • April 12 Familiarizing yourself with the legality of background checks is essential. Continue reading about laws and regulations.
  • April 11

    Understanding the background check obligations in your industry and state.

  • April 10 A former employee of a senior assisted living community is facing charges for stealing from a resident. The alleged theft occurred after the employee gained access to the patient’s credit cards and checking account.
  • April 06 Background checks aren’t pass or fail. Employers consider various factors before making any hiring decision based on background check data.
  • April 06  Level 1 and Level 2 are terms used in Florida law to describe background check requirements for employers. We look at what a Level 2 background check entails.