Oregon Bans Employers from Asking about Salary History in Job Interviews - UPDATED

By Michael Klazema on 10/25/2017

On June 1, 2017, Governor Kate Brown signed House Bill 2005 “The Oregon Equal Pay Act” that made Oregon the first state in 2017 to prohibit employers from asking for applicants’ salary histories during the hiring process. The new act prohibits employers from paying employees less compensation based on their gender, race, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, marital status, veteran status, disability, or age.

Under ORS Chapter 659A, it is an unlawful practice for an employer or prospective employer to:

  • Screen job applicants based on current or past compensation;
  • Determine compensation for a position based on current or past compensation of a prospective employee; and
  • Seek the salary history of an applicant or employee from the applicant or employee from the applicant or employee or a current or former employer of the applicant or employee.

The employer may request a prospective employee for a written authorization to confirm prior compensation after the employer makes an offer of employment that includes an amount of compensation.

The provision prohibiting employers from seeking salary history already took effect on October 6, 2017. In addition, the provision allowing civil actions against employers who seek salary history are not permitted until January 1, 2024.

What This Means to You:

  • This act applies to all employers in Oregon. 
  • Employers may not seek compensation history information from job applicants.
  • An employer is permitted to request an applicant for written authorization to confirm prior compensation after the employer makes an offer of employment that includes an amount of compensation.

The new act is accessible here for review:


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • May 18 In search of more personnel and considering normalization, some major employers have elected to drop pre-employment drug screens for marijuana. As the opioid epidemic continues, there is still a role for workplace drug tests.
  • May 15

    A Congressional IT contractor who is facing bank fraud, a class-action lawsuit, and allegations of cyber breach never underwent a background check. Congressional guidelines recommend background screenings but have a loophole that makes it possible to skip them.

  • May 10 Are SSN background checks essential, or even necessary? We look at what Social Security Number data can and cannot do in the background check process.
  • May 10

    In the wake of an attack in which the perpetrator used a rental vehicle to strike pedestrians, and with a growing number of such attacks around the world in recent years, rental companies must consider how to address the issue. Effective security measures have proven difficult to implement.

  • May 08 Some statistics suggest employers aren’t running international background checks. In a job market where foreign candidates are increasingly common, this oversight can be dangerous.
  • May 03

    Despite player numbers in the millions, the primary sanctioning body for youth soccer in the United States established no standard policy requiring background checks. They face legal jeopardy due to the actions of abusive coaches. 

  • May 03 Are you applying for a job with Starbucks? Here’s what to expect from the background check process.
  • May 02 — Further restrictions have been placed on employers that inquire about prior criminal records. Timeframes have been adjusted and asking about expunged records is prohibited. 
  • May 01 Uber is expanding its background check policies. Going forward, the company will incorporate repeat background checks and ongoing criminal monitoring into its driver screening processes.
  • April 28 Airport background checks are governed by the TSA and FAA. They typically include employment history checks, criminal history searches, and a few other elements.