Blog

 
     

California Governor Vetoes Legislative Bills

By Michael Klazema on 10/13/2015

California Governor Brown vetoed two legislative bills last week that would have limited information available to employers and impacted the hiring process. With the Governor’s veto of Assembly bills 676 and 1017, employers will continue to have access to applicants’ employment status and salary history information.

Assembly Bill 676 would have made it a discriminatory action to seek an applicant’s employment status before determining that the individual meets the minimum employment qualifications for the position. It also would have prohibited employers from publishing any advertisements or announcements stating that an unemployed person is ineligible for the job. In vetoing the bill, the Governor stated that the proposed law did not provide a proper or effective path to get unemployed people back to work. He vetoed a similar bill last year.

Assembly Bill 1017 would have prohibited employers from seeking salary history information, including compensation and benefits, about applicants for employment. The Governor cited the California Fair Pay Act (Senate Bill 358) that he signed earlier this month in his reason for vetoing AB 1017. The California Fair Pay Act requires that women be paid equally for work that is substantially similar to the work of their male colleagues. The Governor said Assembly bill 1017 broadly prohibits employers from obtaining relevant information with little evidence that it would assure more equitable wages. He wants to give the Fair Pay Act a chance to work before making further changes.

What This Means To You:

  • California Governor Brown vetoed Assembly bills 676 and 1017.
  • Employers will continue to have access to applicants’ employment status and salary history information when making employment decisions.
  • Disregard any notice stating these bills have passed and that employers are prohibited from seeking the employment status or salary history of applicants in California.

Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • February 18

    Many hiring decisions are based mostly on candidates’ past work experiences. Here’s how a background check can verify employers to make sure those hiring decisions are grounded in fact.


  • February 14 As more states legalize various forms of marijuana, past marijuana convictions are still causing concern while uncertainty over substances such as CBD drives new arrests. 
  • February 12 A new bill in the New York State legislature could add new requirements for school employee background checks. Currently, private schools are not required to follow state mandates regarding background checks.
  • February 07 Some parents in El Paso, Texas have been left wondering about the strength of their city's youth sports procedures after a felon fraudulently took funds for a girls' soccer team.
  • February 06 If there is one way that volunteer organizations could serve their communities better, it’s implementing more thorough volunteer screening policies.
  • February 05 Madison County, Illinois has created a new initiative designed to help individuals overcome barriers to employment. Clients of the initiative will be able to explore criminal record expungement among other options.
  • February 01 An OfficeTeam survey found that the two most common forms of resume dishonesty had to do with past employers: job experience and job duties or responsibilities.
  • January 31 During the longest government shutdown in U.S. history, hundreds of thousands of federal employees have gone without work for more than a month. Some are finding temporary alternatives elsewhere.
  • January 29 A Florida nurse has been arrested for allegedly stealing two types of prescription pain medications from the county jail where she worked. The case highlights the importance of rigorous drug testing procedures for employment situations in which employees have access to prescription drugs.
  • January 24 After the airline failed to adequately disclose to applicants that they would undergo a background check, a court has ruled Delta did not meet its legislative obligations. The settlement highlights the importance of rigorous compliance.