Blog

 
     

California Governor Vetoes Legislative Bills

By Michael Klazema on 10/13/2015

California Governor Brown vetoed two legislative bills last week that would have limited information available to employers and impacted the hiring process. With the Governor’s veto of Assembly bills 676 and 1017, employers will continue to have access to applicants’ employment status and salary history information.

Assembly Bill 676 would have made it a discriminatory action to seek an applicant’s employment status before determining that the individual meets the minimum employment qualifications for the position. It also would have prohibited employers from publishing any advertisements or announcements stating that an unemployed person is ineligible for the job. In vetoing the bill, the Governor stated that the proposed law did not provide a proper or effective path to get unemployed people back to work. He vetoed a similar bill last year.

Assembly Bill 1017 would have prohibited employers from seeking salary history information, including compensation and benefits, about applicants for employment. The Governor cited the California Fair Pay Act (Senate Bill 358) that he signed earlier this month in his reason for vetoing AB 1017. The California Fair Pay Act requires that women be paid equally for work that is substantially similar to the work of their male colleagues. The Governor said Assembly bill 1017 broadly prohibits employers from obtaining relevant information with little evidence that it would assure more equitable wages. He wants to give the Fair Pay Act a chance to work before making further changes.

What This Means To You:

  • California Governor Brown vetoed Assembly bills 676 and 1017.
  • Employers will continue to have access to applicants’ employment status and salary history information when making employment decisions.
  • Disregard any notice stating these bills have passed and that employers are prohibited from seeking the employment status or salary history of applicants in California.

Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • November 08 A Texas-based company was found to be supplying landlords with inaccurate background check results, potentially affecting housing decisions. The company must pay a record-setting settlement.
  • November 07 Orange Leaf Frozen Yogurt brand trusts backgroundchecks.com to perform the crucial function of background checks on job candidates before extending offers of employment.
  • November 06 The man previously responsible for running background checks on New York City’s school bus drivers says the city’s Department of Education has been pushing back against more thorough checks. The DOE reportedly circumnavigated proper bus driver vetting channels for most of the spring and summer this year.
  • November 06 If you have a series of speeding tickets or other traffic violations, do you need to disclose them as criminal history?
  • November 01 South Carolina's legislature recently adopted a measure to expand access to expungement opportunities for the state's ex-convicts, but other gaps in the process remain. Advocates disagree on how to address the problem to protect offenders as well as the public.
  • October 31 Background checks will show different things depending on the type of check. Here are a few ways employers can use background checks to learn about candidates.
  • October 30 The Pentagon recently disclosed a breach that exposed the personal information of roughly 30,000 personnel. The government blamed the breach on a contractor, calling into question background check policies for federal government vendors.
  • October 30 Just because a record has been expunged from the record or sealed from public view doesn’t mean all traces of it are gone. Expunged and sealed records can sometimes show up on criminal background checks.
  • October 29 What is the status of your driver’s license? Not only can driver’s license statuses impact your ability to drive legally, but they can also impact your auto insurance coverage.
  • October 26 As fresh details emerge in the long-running sex abuse scandal plaguing the Catholic Church, some efforts to mitigate risks and protect the vulnerable stand out from the rest, including those in the diocese of Austin, Texas.