Blog

 
     

Nevada Amends Its Consumer Reporting Law

By Michael Klazema on 6/26/2015

Governor Sandoval has approved Senate Bill 409, thereby amending the state’s Consumer Reporting Law (Nev. Rev. Stat. § 598C). The amendments to the law became effective upon the Governor’s signature on June 9, 2015.

Section 598C.150 relates to the purging of information from the files of reporting agencies. It was amended to read, in relevant part:

“A reporting agency shall periodically purge from its files and after purging shall not disclose, except as otherwise provided by a specific statute, including without limitation Section 1 of this act, any other civil judgment, a report of criminal proceedings, or other adverse information, excluding a record of a conviction of a crime, which precedes the report by more than 7 years. “

The amendment extends the obsolescence for criminal convictions reported by consumer agencies, thereby permitting the disclosure of convictions which precede the report by more than seven years.

You can view Senate Bill 409 here: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/Session/78th2015/Bills/SB/SB409_EN.pdf

What This Means For You:

  • Nevada has amended its law relating to requirements for consumer reporting agencies by removing the prohibition against disclosing a record of conviction of a crime which is more than 7 years old. This means that there is no limitation of time for which such a record may be disclosed.
  • Unless you set a limit on reporting criminal convictions in states where that reporting was not limited by law, we will start reporting convictions over seven years old for your Nevada applicants, without you needing to do anything.
  • If, as a business matter, you have instructed us not to report records that are older than some period, we will apply that instruction to your Nevada applicants, without you needing to do anything.
  • If you have questions, please contact Client Services.

Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • May 18 In search of more personnel and considering normalization, some major employers have elected to drop pre-employment drug screens for marijuana. As the opioid epidemic continues, there is still a role for workplace drug tests.
  • May 15

    A Congressional IT contractor who is facing bank fraud, a class-action lawsuit, and allegations of cyber breach never underwent a background check. Congressional guidelines recommend background screenings but have a loophole that makes it possible to skip them.


  • May 10 Are SSN background checks essential, or even necessary? We look at what Social Security Number data can and cannot do in the background check process.
  • May 10

    In the wake of an attack in which the perpetrator used a rental vehicle to strike pedestrians, and with a growing number of such attacks around the world in recent years, rental companies must consider how to address the issue. Effective security measures have proven difficult to implement.


  • May 08 Some statistics suggest employers aren’t running international background checks. In a job market where foreign candidates are increasingly common, this oversight can be dangerous.
  • May 03

    Despite player numbers in the millions, the primary sanctioning body for youth soccer in the United States established no standard policy requiring background checks. They face legal jeopardy due to the actions of abusive coaches. 


  • May 03 Are you applying for a job with Starbucks? Here’s what to expect from the background check process.
  • May 02 — Further restrictions have been placed on employers that inquire about prior criminal records. Timeframes have been adjusted and asking about expunged records is prohibited. 
  • May 01 Uber is expanding its background check policies. Going forward, the company will incorporate repeat background checks and ongoing criminal monitoring into its driver screening processes.
  • April 28 Airport background checks are governed by the TSA and FAA. They typically include employment history checks, criminal history searches, and a few other elements.