Blog

 
     

Pardoned or Annulled Convictions Not a Bar to Employment in Washington

By Michael Klazema on 4/14/2014

The state of Washington recently passed a bill relating to background checks for persons who have access to children or vulnerable adults. Senate bill 6095 amends the section of the law (Revised Code of Washington § 43.43.842) that deals with licensing requirements for agencies, facilities, and individuals who provide care and treatment to vulnerable adults, including nursing pools. Section 43.43.842 applies to applicants and employees in assisted living facilities or boarding homes, hospitals, and home care agencies, and other long-term care facilities.

As required by state law (RCW § 43.43.834), individuals who have unsupervised access to vulnerable adults must disclose in writing all crimes against children or other persons, all crimes relating to financial exploitation, and all crimes relating to drugs committed by the individual. The rules adopted under RCW § 43.43.842 permit a licensee to consider the criminal history of an applicant for employment when the applicant has one or more convictions for a past offense, and certain conditions apply. Senate bill 6095 expands the list of exceptions to include individuals exempted by the department of social and health services’ assessment review in 2002, and convictions or dispositions that have been pardoned, annulled, or subject to other equivalent procedure. 

Therefore, unless otherwise barred, applicants may be considered for employment if they have one or more convictions for a past offense and:

  1. The offense was a simple assault, assault in the fourth degree, or the same offense as it may be renamed, and three or more years have passed between the most recent conviction and the date of application for employment;
  2. The offense was prostitution, or the same offense as it may be renamed, and three or more years have passed between the most recent conviction and the date of application for employment;
  3. The offense was theft in the third degree, or the same offense as it may be renamed, and three or more years have passed between the most recent convictions and the date of application for employment;
  4. The offense was theft in the second degree, or the same offense as it may be renamed, and five or more years have passed between the most recent conviction and the date of the application for employment;
  5. The offense was forgery, or the same offense as it may be renewed, and five or more years have passed between the most recent conviction and the date of the application for employment;
  6. The department of social and health services reviewed the employee’s otherwise disqualifying criminal history through the department of social and health services’ background assessment review team process conducted in 2002, and determined that the employee could remain in a position covered by § 43.43.842; or
  7. The otherwise disqualifying conviction or disposition has been the subject of a pardon, annulment, or other equivalent procedure.

The amendments of Senate bill 6095 become effective June 12, 2014. 

Other states have similar laws that deal with pardoned or annulled conviction records. We are likely to see more states restrict employers’ access to and use of these criminal histories. This bill is a welcome restoration of employers’ discretion to make sound business judgments about criminal history. We will continue to monitor this subject and let you know of any changes to state or federal laws.

Senate Bill 6095 is available here: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/documents/billdocs/2013-14/Pdf/Bills/Session%20Laws/Senate/6095-S.SL.pdf



Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • November 08 A Texas-based company was found to be supplying landlords with inaccurate background check results, potentially affecting housing decisions. The company must pay a record-setting settlement.
  • November 07 Orange Leaf Frozen Yogurt brand trusts backgroundchecks.com to perform the crucial function of background checks on job candidates before extending offers of employment.
  • November 06 The man previously responsible for running background checks on New York City’s school bus drivers says the city’s Department of Education has been pushing back against more thorough checks. The DOE reportedly circumnavigated proper bus driver vetting channels for most of the spring and summer this year.
  • November 06 If you have a series of speeding tickets or other traffic violations, do you need to disclose them as criminal history?
  • November 01 South Carolina's legislature recently adopted a measure to expand access to expungement opportunities for the state's ex-convicts, but other gaps in the process remain. Advocates disagree on how to address the problem to protect offenders as well as the public.
  • October 31 Background checks will show different things depending on the type of check. Here are a few ways employers can use background checks to learn about candidates.
  • October 30 The Pentagon recently disclosed a breach that exposed the personal information of roughly 30,000 personnel. The government blamed the breach on a contractor, calling into question background check policies for federal government vendors.
  • October 30 Just because a record has been expunged from the record or sealed from public view doesn’t mean all traces of it are gone. Expunged and sealed records can sometimes show up on criminal background checks.
  • October 29 What is the status of your driver’s license? Not only can driver’s license statuses impact your ability to drive legally, but they can also impact your auto insurance coverage.
  • October 26 As fresh details emerge in the long-running sex abuse scandal plaguing the Catholic Church, some efforts to mitigate risks and protect the vulnerable stand out from the rest, including those in the diocese of Austin, Texas.