Blog

 
     

Pardoned or Annulled Convictions Not a Bar to Employment in Washington

By Michael Klazema on 4/14/2014

The state of Washington recently passed a bill relating to background checks for persons who have access to children or vulnerable adults. Senate bill 6095 amends the section of the law (Revised Code of Washington § 43.43.842) that deals with licensing requirements for agencies, facilities, and individuals who provide care and treatment to vulnerable adults, including nursing pools. Section 43.43.842 applies to applicants and employees in assisted living facilities or boarding homes, hospitals, and home care agencies, and other long-term care facilities.

As required by state law (RCW § 43.43.834), individuals who have unsupervised access to vulnerable adults must disclose in writing all crimes against children or other persons, all crimes relating to financial exploitation, and all crimes relating to drugs committed by the individual. The rules adopted under RCW § 43.43.842 permit a licensee to consider the criminal history of an applicant for employment when the applicant has one or more convictions for a past offense, and certain conditions apply. Senate bill 6095 expands the list of exceptions to include individuals exempted by the department of social and health services’ assessment review in 2002, and convictions or dispositions that have been pardoned, annulled, or subject to other equivalent procedure. 

Therefore, unless otherwise barred, applicants may be considered for employment if they have one or more convictions for a past offense and:

  1. The offense was a simple assault, assault in the fourth degree, or the same offense as it may be renamed, and three or more years have passed between the most recent conviction and the date of application for employment;
  2. The offense was prostitution, or the same offense as it may be renamed, and three or more years have passed between the most recent conviction and the date of application for employment;
  3. The offense was theft in the third degree, or the same offense as it may be renamed, and three or more years have passed between the most recent convictions and the date of application for employment;
  4. The offense was theft in the second degree, or the same offense as it may be renamed, and five or more years have passed between the most recent conviction and the date of the application for employment;
  5. The offense was forgery, or the same offense as it may be renewed, and five or more years have passed between the most recent conviction and the date of the application for employment;
  6. The department of social and health services reviewed the employee’s otherwise disqualifying criminal history through the department of social and health services’ background assessment review team process conducted in 2002, and determined that the employee could remain in a position covered by § 43.43.842; or
  7. The otherwise disqualifying conviction or disposition has been the subject of a pardon, annulment, or other equivalent procedure.

The amendments of Senate bill 6095 become effective June 12, 2014. 

Other states have similar laws that deal with pardoned or annulled conviction records. We are likely to see more states restrict employers’ access to and use of these criminal histories. This bill is a welcome restoration of employers’ discretion to make sound business judgments about criminal history. We will continue to monitor this subject and let you know of any changes to state or federal laws.

Senate Bill 6095 is available here: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/documents/billdocs/2013-14/Pdf/Bills/Session%20Laws/Senate/6095-S.SL.pdf



Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • May 18 In search of more personnel and considering normalization, some major employers have elected to drop pre-employment drug screens for marijuana. As the opioid epidemic continues, there is still a role for workplace drug tests.
  • May 15

    A Congressional IT contractor who is facing bank fraud, a class-action lawsuit, and allegations of cyber breach never underwent a background check. Congressional guidelines recommend background screenings but have a loophole that makes it possible to skip them.


  • May 10 Are SSN background checks essential, or even necessary? We look at what Social Security Number data can and cannot do in the background check process.
  • May 10

    In the wake of an attack in which the perpetrator used a rental vehicle to strike pedestrians, and with a growing number of such attacks around the world in recent years, rental companies must consider how to address the issue. Effective security measures have proven difficult to implement.


  • May 08 Some statistics suggest employers aren’t running international background checks. In a job market where foreign candidates are increasingly common, this oversight can be dangerous.
  • May 03

    Despite player numbers in the millions, the primary sanctioning body for youth soccer in the United States established no standard policy requiring background checks. They face legal jeopardy due to the actions of abusive coaches. 


  • May 03 Are you applying for a job with Starbucks? Here’s what to expect from the background check process.
  • May 02 — Further restrictions have been placed on employers that inquire about prior criminal records. Timeframes have been adjusted and asking about expunged records is prohibited. 
  • May 01 Uber is expanding its background check policies. Going forward, the company will incorporate repeat background checks and ongoing criminal monitoring into its driver screening processes.
  • April 28 Airport background checks are governed by the TSA and FAA. They typically include employment history checks, criminal history searches, and a few other elements.