Blog

 
     

Pardoned or Annulled Convictions Not a Bar to Employment in Washington

By Michael Klazema on 4/14/2014

The state of Washington recently passed a bill relating to background checks for persons who have access to children or vulnerable adults. Senate bill 6095 amends the section of the law (Revised Code of Washington § 43.43.842) that deals with licensing requirements for agencies, facilities, and individuals who provide care and treatment to vulnerable adults, including nursing pools. Section 43.43.842 applies to applicants and employees in assisted living facilities or boarding homes, hospitals, and home care agencies, and other long-term care facilities.

As required by state law (RCW § 43.43.834), individuals who have unsupervised access to vulnerable adults must disclose in writing all crimes against children or other persons, all crimes relating to financial exploitation, and all crimes relating to drugs committed by the individual. The rules adopted under RCW § 43.43.842 permit a licensee to consider the criminal history of an applicant for employment when the applicant has one or more convictions for a past offense, and certain conditions apply. Senate bill 6095 expands the list of exceptions to include individuals exempted by the department of social and health services’ assessment review in 2002, and convictions or dispositions that have been pardoned, annulled, or subject to other equivalent procedure. 

Therefore, unless otherwise barred, applicants may be considered for employment if they have one or more convictions for a past offense and:

  1. The offense was a simple assault, assault in the fourth degree, or the same offense as it may be renamed, and three or more years have passed between the most recent conviction and the date of application for employment;
  2. The offense was prostitution, or the same offense as it may be renamed, and three or more years have passed between the most recent conviction and the date of application for employment;
  3. The offense was theft in the third degree, or the same offense as it may be renamed, and three or more years have passed between the most recent convictions and the date of application for employment;
  4. The offense was theft in the second degree, or the same offense as it may be renamed, and five or more years have passed between the most recent conviction and the date of the application for employment;
  5. The offense was forgery, or the same offense as it may be renewed, and five or more years have passed between the most recent conviction and the date of the application for employment;
  6. The department of social and health services reviewed the employee’s otherwise disqualifying criminal history through the department of social and health services’ background assessment review team process conducted in 2002, and determined that the employee could remain in a position covered by § 43.43.842; or
  7. The otherwise disqualifying conviction or disposition has been the subject of a pardon, annulment, or other equivalent procedure.

The amendments of Senate bill 6095 become effective June 12, 2014. 

Other states have similar laws that deal with pardoned or annulled conviction records. We are likely to see more states restrict employers’ access to and use of these criminal histories. This bill is a welcome restoration of employers’ discretion to make sound business judgments about criminal history. We will continue to monitor this subject and let you know of any changes to state or federal laws.

Senate Bill 6095 is available here: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/documents/billdocs/2013-14/Pdf/Bills/Session%20Laws/Senate/6095-S.SL.pdf



Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • August 10 Moore Advanced teamed up with backgroundchecks.com to secure the best possible hires. Read more about how this process has assisted them.
  • August 10 An adjudication withheld is a court agreement that doesn’t qualify as a conviction but can make matters confusing for individuals applying for jobs. Should you disclose a withheld adjudication to a prospective employer?
  • August 09 With adults now legally using recreational marijuana in numerous states, and with additional legalization efforts in the wings, expungement of old and minor drug-related convictions is more important than ever.
  • August 07 A West Virginia TV station is pushing the state’s Child Protective Services and Department of Health and Human Services to answer questions about background check policies. A CPS employee was recently charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor, domestic assault, and threatening a police officer.
  • August 02 Woes continue for ridesharing companies struggling to keep riders safe after a man, illegally in the United States, was arrested and accused of several rapes dating back years.
  • July 31 South Carolina legislators recently passed a new law that will change the language of the state’s expungement policy. The new law will make expungement possible for repeat offenders. The previous law only allowed first offenses to be scrubbed from the public record.
  • July 26

    Hawaii employers have been banned from asking job applicants about their salary history. The new act’s effective date is January 1, 2019, and covers all employers that have at least one employee in that state.

  • July 26

    The expansion of the The North Carolina Certificate of Relief  Law, offers relief to jobseekers. An employer may take into consideration a certificate of relief despite the applicant’s criminal past; however, the certificate is not an expungement or pardon.

  • July 26

    With growing concerns about liability, businesses are transitioning away from one-time background checks in favor of continuous checks. The results are impacting both employers and employees.


  • July 25 Uber is officially launching a new ongoing criminal monitoring policy for drivers. The company started rolling out the new system in early July and will expand it in the months to come.