Tenant Screenings in Oregon Have Become More Restricted

By Michael Klazema on 11/23/2013

With the passage of Senate Bill 91 earlier this year, landlords in Oregon will be limited in the use of information obtained in tenant screenings. Landlords will be restricted in the use of criminal history and other information. The new restrictions become effective January 1, 2014.

When evaluating an applicant for a rental agreement, a landlord may not consider an action taken against a tenant to recover possession of a property under certain circumstances. An eviction action may not be considered if it was dismissed or resulted in a general judgment for the applicant before he or she submits an application. An eviction action may not be considered if it resulted in a general judgment against the applicant five or more years before the application is submitted. 

When evaluating an applicant for a rental agreement, a landlord may not consider a previous arrest record if the arrest did not result in a conviction. However, landlords may consider criminal convictions and pending charges if it is for conduct that is:

  1. A drug-related crime;
  2. A crime against a person;
  3. A sex crime;
  4. A crime involving financial fraud, including identity theft and forgery; or
  5. Any other crime that involves conduct that would adversely affect property of the landlord or a tenant, or the health, safety or right to peaceful enjoyment of the premises.

Under Oregon law, a landlord must give an applicant actual notice of the fact that the application was denied based in whole or in part on a tenant screening company or consumer credit reporting agency report. The notice must be provided at the same time that the landlord notifies the applicant that his or her application for a rental agreement is denied.

A landlord may require an applicant to pay the average actual screening costs at the time that the application for a rental agreement is processed. Actual costs may include the cost of using a tenant screening company or a consumer credit reporting agency.

Senate Bill 91 has other provisions affecting landlords and tenants. For instance, it allows landlords to require a tenant to obtain and maintain renter’s liability insurance.

A review of Senate Bill 91 is available here:

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • February 18

    Many hiring decisions are based mostly on candidates’ past work experiences. Here’s how a background check can verify employers to make sure those hiring decisions are grounded in fact.

  • February 14 As more states legalize various forms of marijuana, past marijuana convictions are still causing concern while uncertainty over substances such as CBD drives new arrests. 
  • February 12 A new bill in the New York State legislature could add new requirements for school employee background checks. Currently, private schools are not required to follow state mandates regarding background checks.
  • February 07 Some parents in El Paso, Texas have been left wondering about the strength of their city's youth sports procedures after a felon fraudulently took funds for a girls' soccer team.
  • February 06 If there is one way that volunteer organizations could serve their communities better, it’s implementing more thorough volunteer screening policies.
  • February 05 Madison County, Illinois has created a new initiative designed to help individuals overcome barriers to employment. Clients of the initiative will be able to explore criminal record expungement among other options.
  • February 01 An OfficeTeam survey found that the two most common forms of resume dishonesty had to do with past employers: job experience and job duties or responsibilities.
  • January 31 During the longest government shutdown in U.S. history, hundreds of thousands of federal employees have gone without work for more than a month. Some are finding temporary alternatives elsewhere.
  • January 29 A Florida nurse has been arrested for allegedly stealing two types of prescription pain medications from the county jail where she worked. The case highlights the importance of rigorous drug testing procedures for employment situations in which employees have access to prescription drugs.
  • January 24 After the airline failed to adequately disclose to applicants that they would undergo a background check, a court has ruled Delta did not meet its legislative obligations. The settlement highlights the importance of rigorous compliance.