Blog

 
     

Indiana Amends the Process to Seal and Expunge Conviction Records

By Michael Klazema on 6/25/2013

The Indiana legislature significantly changed the law for the expungement process in 2013. The changes impact the eligibility of persons who have a conviction in their background. It also establishes an unlawful practice to discriminate against persons because of a sealed or expunged criminal record, and provides remedies for violations.

The Act adds Chapter 9 to Indiana Code 35-38 entitled Sealing and Expunging Conviction Records. The changes listed in this Chapter provide the eligibility requirements for the sealing or expungement of criminal records. The following persons are eligible to petition the court to seal or expunge criminal records:

  1. Persons who have been arrested, if the arrest did not result in a conviction or juvenile adjudication, or it did and the conviction or adjudication was vacated on appeal. In this circumstance, records may be sealed after one year from the date of arrest.
  2. Persons convicted of a misdemeanor, including a Class D felony that was reduced to a misdemeanor. Persons may petition the court to expunge these records after five years from the date of conviction, or sooner if the prosecuting attorney consents.
  3. Persons convicted of a Class D felony. This provision may not apply if the Class D felony was reduced to a Class A misdemeanor. A petition may be granted to have this record expunged after eight years from the date of conviction, or sooner if the prosecuting attorney consents. This provision does not apply to elected officials, sex or violent offenders, or persons convicted of a felony that resulted in bodily injury to another person, perjury, or official misconduct. Other barrier crimes are listed in Indiana Code Sections 35-42-1, 35-42-3.5, or 35-42-4.
  4. Persons convicted of a felony. A person may petition the court to expunge these records after eight years from the completion of the persons’ sentence. The eight-year period includes the completion of a term of supervised release and the satisfaction of all other obligations placed as part of the sentence. This provision does not apply to an elected official, or a person convicted of a sex or violent crime or felony that resulted in serious bodily injury to another person. Crimes listed in Indiana Code Sections 35-42-1, 35-42-3.5, or 35-42-4 will also disqualify a person from having records expunged under the law.
  5. Persons convicted of a felony including elected officials and felonies that resulted in serious bodily injury to another person. Petitions may not be filed until ten years after the completion of the person’s sentence, including the completion of any term of supervised release and the satisfaction of all other obligations placed on the person as part of the sentence. Exceptions to this section include a sex or violent offender and the crimes listed in Indiana Code Sections 35-42-1, 35-42-3.5, or 35-42-4.

The law establishes an unlawful practice in several ways if adverse action is taken against any person because of a sealed or expunged conviction or arrest record. It is now unlawful to suspend, expel, or refuse to employ a person, or to otherwise discriminate against a person for this reason. It is considered discrimination to refuse to admit, grant, or renew a license permit, or certificate necessary to engage in any activity, occupation, or profession based on sealed or expunged records. Employers are permitted to inquire about a previous criminal record only in terms that do not include the disclosure of expunged or sealed records. A person whose record is expunged must be treated as if he or she had never been convicted of the crime.

Any person who is found to have discriminated against a person in violation of this Act commits a Class C infraction and may be held in contempt of court. Other remedies provided in the Act include judicial or administrative claims, and injunctive relief. Finally, the Act prohibits the admission of an expunged record in an action for negligent hiring, admission, or licensure against an employer or another person who relied on this law.

These changes become effective July 1, 2013.

The Act may be viewed here: http://www.in.gov/legislative/bills/2013/PDF/HE/HE1482.1.pdf


Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • August 10 Moore Advanced teamed up with backgroundchecks.com to secure the best possible hires. Read more about how this process has assisted them.
  • August 10 An adjudication withheld is a court agreement that doesn’t qualify as a conviction but can make matters confusing for individuals applying for jobs. Should you disclose a withheld adjudication to a prospective employer?
  • August 09 With adults now legally using recreational marijuana in numerous states, and with additional legalization efforts in the wings, expungement of old and minor drug-related convictions is more important than ever.
  • August 07 A West Virginia TV station is pushing the state’s Child Protective Services and Department of Health and Human Services to answer questions about background check policies. A CPS employee was recently charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor, domestic assault, and threatening a police officer.
  • August 02 Woes continue for ridesharing companies struggling to keep riders safe after a man, illegally in the United States, was arrested and accused of several rapes dating back years.
  • July 31 South Carolina legislators recently passed a new law that will change the language of the state’s expungement policy. The new law will make expungement possible for repeat offenders. The previous law only allowed first offenses to be scrubbed from the public record.
  • July 26

    Hawaii employers have been banned from asking job applicants about their salary history. The new act’s effective date is January 1, 2019, and covers all employers that have at least one employee in that state.

  • July 26

    The expansion of the The North Carolina Certificate of Relief  Law, offers relief to jobseekers. An employer may take into consideration a certificate of relief despite the applicant’s criminal past; however, the certificate is not an expungement or pardon.

  • July 26

    With growing concerns about liability, businesses are transitioning away from one-time background checks in favor of continuous checks. The results are impacting both employers and employees.


  • July 25 Uber is officially launching a new ongoing criminal monitoring policy for drivers. The company started rolling out the new system in early July and will expand it in the months to come.