Blog

 
     

Montana Limits Access to Social Media Accounts

By Michael Klazema on 4/24/2015

According to House Bill 343, employers and their agents will be prohibited from requiring employees and applicants to:

  1. Disclose a username or password for the purpose of allowing the employer or employer’s agent to access a personal social media account of the employee or applicant;
  2. Access personal social media in the presence of the employer or its agent; or
  3. Divulge any personal social media or information contained on personal social media.

“Personal social media” is defined as a password-protected electronic service or account containing electronic service or account containing electronic content, including but not limited to e-mail, videos, still photographs, blogs, video blogs, podcasts, instant and text messages, internet website profiles or locations, and online services or accounts, including password-protected services or accounts to which an employee may post information, data or pictures. 

The term “personal social media” does not include a social media account that is opened for or provided by an educational institution and intended solely for educational purposes, or opened for or provided by an employer and intended solely for business-related purposes.

Exceptions to these restrictions apply when an investigation is being conducted and the information requested by the employee is necessary to make a factual determination in the investigation, and at least one of the following applies:

  1. The employer has specific information about an activity by the employee indicating work-related employee misconduct or criminal defamation;
  2. The employer has specific information about the unauthorized transfer by the employee of the employer’s proprietary information, confidential information, trade secrets, or financial data to a personal online account or personal online service; or
  3. An employer is required to ensure compliance with applicable federal laws or federal regulatory requirements or with the rules of self-regulatory organizations as defined in section 3(a)(26) of the Securities and Exchange Act.

Employers are not limited or prevented from promulgating and maintaining workplace policies governing the use of its electronic equipment, including a requirement for an employee to disclose to the employer the employee’s username, password, or other information necessary to access employer-issued electronic devices.  This includes cell phones, computers, and tablet computers, or to access employer-provided software or e-mail accounts.

Employers are not permitted to discharge, discipline, threaten to discharge or discipline, or otherwise retaliate against an employee or applicant for failing to comply with a request or demand by the employer that violates the law.

An employee or applicant may bring an action against an employer for violating the law within one year in small claims court.  Additionally, an employee or applicant may have a cause of action under the state’s privacy in communication law. Damages are limited to $500 or actual damages up to $7,000. The prevailing party in a court action may be awarded legal costs.

Montana House Bill 343 is available here for review: http://leg.mt.gov/bills/2015/billpdf/HB0343.pdf

What This Means To You:

  • Montana has made it illegal for employers to require employees and applicants to disclose username and passwords that would allow the employer to access personal social media accounts. 
  • You should determine whether you have employees in the state of Montana. 
  • If you do, review your workplace policies and procedures with your lawyer to ensure compliance with the new law.

Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • November 08 A Texas-based company was found to be supplying landlords with inaccurate background check results, potentially affecting housing decisions. The company must pay a record-setting settlement.
  • November 07 Orange Leaf Frozen Yogurt brand trusts backgroundchecks.com to perform the crucial function of background checks on job candidates before extending offers of employment.
  • November 06 The man previously responsible for running background checks on New York City’s school bus drivers says the city’s Department of Education has been pushing back against more thorough checks. The DOE reportedly circumnavigated proper bus driver vetting channels for most of the spring and summer this year.
  • November 06 If you have a series of speeding tickets or other traffic violations, do you need to disclose them as criminal history?
  • November 01 South Carolina's legislature recently adopted a measure to expand access to expungement opportunities for the state's ex-convicts, but other gaps in the process remain. Advocates disagree on how to address the problem to protect offenders as well as the public.
  • October 31 Background checks will show different things depending on the type of check. Here are a few ways employers can use background checks to learn about candidates.
  • October 30 The Pentagon recently disclosed a breach that exposed the personal information of roughly 30,000 personnel. The government blamed the breach on a contractor, calling into question background check policies for federal government vendors.
  • October 30 Just because a record has been expunged from the record or sealed from public view doesn’t mean all traces of it are gone. Expunged and sealed records can sometimes show up on criminal background checks.
  • October 29 What is the status of your driver’s license? Not only can driver’s license statuses impact your ability to drive legally, but they can also impact your auto insurance coverage.
  • October 26 As fresh details emerge in the long-running sex abuse scandal plaguing the Catholic Church, some efforts to mitigate risks and protect the vulnerable stand out from the rest, including those in the diocese of Austin, Texas.