Study Finds Managers Are Willing to Hire Candidates with Criminal Records

By Michael Klazema on 6/6/2018

A recent study commissioned in a partnership with the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) and the Charles Koch Institute (CKI) found many managers are willing to hire candidates with criminal histories.

Per a report on the survey findings from the SHRM, there are multiple reasons behind the increasing acceptance of ex-criminal offenders in the workplace. One reason is how common criminal records are. Today, roughly one-third of the United States population of an “adult working-age” has a criminal record of some sort. This factor, combined with historically low unemployment rates in most parts of the country, has left employers with little choice but to be more lenient in hiring people with records. Part of the stated reason SHRM and CKI commissioned the study was to see how employers were approaching the “untapped talent source” that is the ex-offender population.

The findings of the study indicate the stigma against hiring people with criminal records may be starting to disappear. Some two-thirds of HR professionals surveyed said their companies had hired people with criminal records. Over 80 percent of managers expressed the belief that workers with criminal records brought as much or more value to their organizations as workers without criminal records.

While some employers said they were hiring ex-offenders out of a sense of duty—whether to give a person a second chance or to help the community by fighting recidivism—more employers said they did so out of a desire to hire the best candidate for the job. The ban the box movement is largely designed with the stated goal of encouraging employers to look beyond criminal history and focus on experience and other qualifications. That effort seems to be working, as nearly half of all managers and HR professionals surveyed said they thought “a demonstrated consistent work history” was the single most important factor to look at when considering a new hire.

Another interesting finding from the SHRM/CKI survey was three-quarters of managers and HR professionals said the cost of hiring people with criminal histories is no higher than hiring people with clean records. One common fear employers have when interviewing ex-offenders is the level of risk and liability that hiring someone with a criminal record can bring to the business. However, this risk can be limited drastically by conducting detailed background checks. Criminal history searchesreference checksemployment and education verificationsdriving history checkscredit checks, and other due diligence screening strategies can do a lot to minimize risks and avoid accusations of negligent hiring.

Another common worry is hiring ex-offenders will affect company culture in a negative way. Certainly, hiring a person with violent tendencies can sacrifice workplace rapport and lead to safety concerns. However, the SHRM/CKI survey indicated most people aren’t any more worried about working with ex-offenders than they are of hiring them. Across all roles, most workers indicated they were willing to work with people who had criminal records.

As legislators continue to pass laws on criminal justice reform—many of them underlining the employment rights of people with criminal records—employers will need to establish strategies for hiring ex-offenders. Based on the SHRM/CKI survey, though, both managers and workers are becoming more comfortable with that inevitable future.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • December 11 The Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General criticized a migrant youth detention center on the border for not running the proper background checks. Federal law requires the facility to screen all employees with FBI fingerprint checks.
  • December 06 In a bid to combat money laundering and illicit funding sources for terrorists flowing through the country's real estate sector, Singapore's government now mandates background checks for buyers purchasing properties prior to development.
  • December 04 What is a reference check? How does it vary from a work history check? We explore these questions and others.
  • December 04 Chicago Public Schools has dismissed hundreds of employees, coaches, vendors, and volunteers based on background check findings. The district recently vowed to re-check the majority of its 68,000 employees after a Chicago Tribune investigation revealed holes in its background check policies.
  • November 29 Striving to create a safer environment more conducive to productive training and leadership development, the Army has recently moved to adopt a uniform policy of background checks for certain roles. 
  • November 27 For hiring managers to verify the information provided on a resume, verification is essential.  Such is the purpose of employment history background checks.
  • November 27 California’s biggest public school district is waiving the cost of volunteer background checks. The move is meant to encourage more family - and community members to get involved with the school district.
  • November 22 Contractors play an important role in the workforce, delivering services to both individuals and organizations. Vetting contractors for suitability continues to be a challenge, as two recent articles prove.
  • November 21 When it comes to background and pre-employment checks, it can be instructive to look at the characteristics of the ten most massive U.S. employers.
  • November 21

    Verification checks are a powerful way to assess how truthful a job candidate has been on his or her application or resume. These checks can verify work history, education verification, professional licenses, and favorable personal qualities.