Blog

 
     

Maine Legislature Considers Completing Plans to Deal with Marijuana Convictions

By Michael Klazema on 5/23/2019

In November 2016, the voters of Maine narrowly approved a ballot question legalizing the production and sale of marijuana for recreational purposes. Since then, clashes between the now-former governor's office and the legislature have delayed the implementation of a legal cannabis market. Some lawmakers have grappled with questions stemming from the legalization of a substance that previously generated many convictions, before and even after the state's 2009 decriminalization efforts. 

Lawmakers are asking how to fairly address those with marijuana charges on their records which can prove to be a hindrance for employment, housing, and other benefits. Two proposals have arisen. 

One calls for the complete expungement of records of civil crimes such as basic marijuana possession. This process would result in the permanent removal of these charges from the public record. The other bill calls for putting the records under seal. Sealed records do not show up in criminal history reports, such as the US OneSEARCH by backgroundchecks.com, but are still in the system and may be seen and accessed by some in the justice system.

Critics point out that under Maine law, expungement is not technically legal; there is no mechanism for expungements of any criminal records; they claim such a proposal would be a usurpation of the courts. Proponents of expungement contend that sealed records could be unsealed in the future, such as in the case of a reversal of legislation on marijuana. 

Either scenario would render records functionally invisible to employers, landlords, and others who typically request background checks before engaging in business with someone. Legislators have yet to decide if the process would be automatic or if individuals would need to apply to have their records removed from public view.

The fate of both proposals is unknown—the bills remain in committee with further talks scheduled. 

Maine is not the only state to consider remedies for individuals convicted on marijuana-related charges. Municipalities such as Denver, Colorado have taken steps to provide a pathway to expungement, reasoning that individuals should not continue to suffer consequences from an activity that is now fully legal. 

backgroundchecks.com reminds employers that past convictions do not necessarily indicate current or future drug use or other inclinations. For those living in states with legalized marijuana, sealing or expunging old records may help to open doors. Through our partner MyClearStart, individuals can explore their options and determine their eligibility for their state's record expungement process, including connecting with qualified legal help. As Maine continues to grapple with the issue of expungement, residents in other states can seek new opportunities for a “clear start” today. 


Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • July 16 A New Jersey organization that was administering federal grant-funded programs has agreed to pay a $1.1 million settlement for failing to conduct background checks on 46 volunteers.
  • July 11 Under an innovative program that went into effect July 1, Pennsylvania will automatically seal many old criminal records. 
  • July 09 In October, the Georgia Long-Term Care Background Check Program will officially go into effect. Here’s what employers in the state need to know about the law.
  • July 04 Despite the failure of a full-scale legalization effort, New York state has reduced cannabis-related penalties and introduced automatic expungement.
  • July 03 Preparing for the employment background check process can improve your chances of getting hired. Here’s how to do it.
  • July 02 Charlotte-Mecklenburg School District in North Carolina stopped fingerprinting new hires last July even though board policy requires fingerprinting during pre-hire background checks. The fingerprinting “pause” caused alarm in the Charlotte community.
  • June 27 In 2012, the EEOC published new guidelines instructing employers not to use blanket bans against applicants with criminal records. The state of Texas sued. Today, arguments continue in federal circuit court.
  • June 25 Learn the differences between infractions, misdemeanors, and felonies and what each run-in with the law means for a background check report.
  • June 25 A recent federal court ruling has called into question how employers should observe the FCRA when filling independent contractor positions rather than full- or part-time jobs. Many sections of the FCRA are only relevant if background checks are intended for “employment purposes.”
  • June 20 The ACLU has filed suit against the owner of an apartment complex in Virginia alleging discriminatory practices. The owner contends otherwise.