March 3rd, 2026
We got a call from a new customer, an HR director at a mid-sized healthcare staffing company in Ohio. She was seven days into waiting for a background check on a nurse practitioner they desperately needed to start. The check had flagged a 16-year-old misdemeanor conviction from when the candidate was 19, a marijuana possession charge in a state where marijuana is now legal.
Jennifer had spent 45 minutes trying to get ahold of a customer service rep to get some guidance. There was no answer and the “Help” Center, while robust, did not address her specific use case.
What she actually needed was a human being who could answer a specific question:
When her call went unanswered, she submitted a support ticket. 48 hours later, she still hadn't heard back.
Out of desperation, she called our 800 number. She was immediately connected to one of our agents (a human agent & US-based employee).
Our team member walked her through exactly how to document their assessment to stay compliant with both FCRA and Ohio employment law.
Total time on the phone: 12 minutes.
Jennifer made the hire two days later. The candidate started on schedule. No compliance violations, no lawsuits, no delayed placement.
This is why we'll never eliminate human, US-based phone support.
Starting in early 2025, several major background screening companies began eliminating phone support entirely.
Their bet: customers would accept chatbot-only support in exchange for lower prices and faster automation. After all, most industries were moving in this direction. The worst part, they raised their prices and demanded minimum spend contracts.
The numbers must have looked compelling in boardrooms. Phone support is expensive. Chatbots scale infinitely. AI can handle common questions. Why pay compliance specialists when a large language model can answer FCRA questions?
Here's what those spreadsheets missed: background checks aren't a commodity service where automation solves everything. Human support has become a rare novelty.
And the real costs of eliminating human support are showing up in customer reviews. I’m seeing pattern—>
Staffing agencies losing placements because they couldn't get fast answers on compliance questions
HR departments making risky decisions without expert guidance because chatbots couldn't help
Candidates stuck in background check limbo with nobody to call for status updates or dispute resolution
The automation-first approach works great for simple, transactional services. But background screening isn't transactional, it's one of the most legally complex processes in hiring.
Let me be specific about what makes this industry different.
The Fair Credit Reporting Act requires specific procedures when you're considering not hiring someone based on their background check (called "adverse action").
But FCRA implementation varies dramatically based on:
Your industry: Healthcare has different requirements than retail or finance
Your location: California's rules are different than Texas
The type of offense: Violent crimes vs. financial crimes vs. traffic violations
How long ago it occurred: 2 years vs. 10 years vs. 20 years
Case disposition: Dismissed, expunged, sealed, or convicted
A chatbot can give you a generic adverse action letter template. A compliance specialist can walk you through whether you even need to send one, given your specific circumstances.
What happens when a candidate says the assault conviction on their report isn't theirs, it's someone with the same name in the same city?
Or when county court records show conflicting information about whether a case was dismissed or is still pending?
Or when a background check reveals a warrant, but the candidate has documentation proving it was resolved three years ago?
These scenarios require actual investigation: calling courthouses, reviewing documentation, understanding court systems, and guiding clients through dispute processes.
A chatbot cannot handle those workflows. While BackgroundChecks.com has an industry-leading accuracy rate and an astonishingly low dispute rate, issues arise, and we have a human team trained and ready for you!
Imagine you're an HR director at a restaurant chain. You need to fill 12 line cook positions before your summer season starts in three weeks. A batch of background checks comes back, and three have minor discrepancies.
Do you:
Wait 2-3 days for a ticket response while your candidates accept other offers?
Spend an hour trying to interpret FCRA guidelines yourself and risk getting it wrong?
Make a potentially non-compliant decision because you're under time pressure?
Or do you pick up the phone, talk to a screening specialist for 10 minutes, and get clear guidance so you can move forward confidently?
Speed matters in hiring. But speed without expertise creates compliance risk and leads to poor hiring decisions.
That's the trap our competition has fallen into: they've optimized for efficiency while sacrificing the expertise that actually protects clients (and themselves).
Let's talk about what actually happens when you eliminate human support.
When clients can't get quick answers to FCRA questions, they make judgment calls without full information.
This leads to violations, lawsuits, and regulatory scrutiny.
One FCRA class-action lawsuit can settle for millions of dollars. It doesn't require more than one Google search to see how these types of lawsuits play out in court and the financial settlements that arise because of judgment calls on compliance.
Nothing frustrates candidates more than being stuck in background check limbo with no human to talk to.
They call your company. You tell them to contact the screening provider. They get routed to a chatbot that can't answer their specific question.
This reflects poorly on your employer brand, not just the screening company's.
We get calls every week from candidates whose previous background checks (with other providers) are stuck in discrepancy hell. They can't get anyone on the phone. Their potential employers are getting frustrated. Job offers are being withdrawn.
It's heartbreaking because most of these issues could be resolved with a 10-minute phone call to the right person.
When your HR team can't get answers from your screening provider, they spend hours:
Researching FCRA requirements themselves
Reading help articles that don't quite answer their specific question
Second-guessing decisions
Creating workarounds
That's time they could spend actually recruiting and onboarding.
I talked to a VP of HR for a hotel chain last month who calculated his team was spending 6-8 hours per week troubleshooting background check issues because their provider had eliminated or reduced phone support.
At their fully-loaded labor cost, that was costing them over $20,000 per year in wasted time, more than they were "saving" with the cheaper provider. It wasn’t a tough sale for us!
Every day a background check question goes unanswered is another day your accepted candidate is in limbo, and potentially accepting another offer.
Our average call time with clients who have compliance questions is ~8 minutes.
Our competitors' average ticket response time? 36-48 hours according to their own support SLAs.
That difference matters when you're competing for talent in a tight labor market.
At BackgroundChecks.com, we've made a deliberate choice: we will never eliminate human phone support.
I know that's a bold promise in an industry racing toward full automation. But it's one we're committed to for a simple reason: our clients deserve better.
When you call us during business hours, you get a real person who:
Understands background screening regulations
Understands FCRA compliance requirements
Can help you navigate complex, nuanced situations
Will follow up personally if investigation is needed
Here's what phone support with BackgroundChecks.com looks like in practice:
Immediate phone access during business hours, no fighting through chatbot menus or waiting in automated queues. You call, you get a human.
Compliance specialists who know their stuff. Our team can answer FCRA, Ban the Box, and state-specific questions. They're not reading from scripts or searching help articles while you wait.
Courteous follow-up on complex issues. If your question requires research (calling a courthouse, verifying documentation, checking local ordinances), we'll call you back with answers, not send you a ticket update three days later.
Transparency about what's actually available. We'll tell you honestly what information we can and can't provide, how long things will take, and what your options are. No runarounds, no vague promises.
Does this cost more than routing everything through a chatbot? Yes. We invest in human support because you are investing in us.
Need Background Checks?
See packages and pricing and order instantly.
National, County, Statewide, Federal Criminal Searches
Motor Vehicle Records
Employment & Education Verifications
Bankruptcies, Liens, & Judgments
Drug Testing
Hospitality Hiring Guide: Background Checks for Hotels & Restaurants
TruthFinder Review: The Real Risks of Using People-Search Sites
BeenVerified Review: What “Been Verified” Really Means (and What It Doesn’t)
Scaling Starts with People: How McDonald’s Develops Talent and High-Performing Franchise Operators
Keeping Volunteer Organizations Safe During the Holiday Season
Why We Require Social Security Numbers: A Case for Accuracy in Background Checks
A Note from ClearChecks on HireRight Acquisition & New BackgroundChecks.com
Resources
Background Checks