Blog

 
     

Tampa Bay Area Residents Fighting Against Pending Ridesharing Regulations

By Michael Klazema on 9/19/2016

Tampa Bay is just one step away from being the latest county in the United States to mandate additional background checks for ridesharing drivers. According to a report from the Tampa Bay Business Journal, the Hillsborough County Public Transportation Commission is nearing a vote that would further regulate companies like Uber and Lyft. Among the pending requirements are fingerprint background checks for all drivers—the same regulation that has caused Uber and Lyft to abandon several cities throughout the country.

Background checks aren't the only regulation that could be coming down the pipeline toward ridesharing businesses. The Public Transportation Commission wants vehicle inspections of all cars used for ridesharing purposes as well as minimum wait times and fares. The commission is thinking about imposing a "maximum driver limit" for each ridesharing company, a regulation that would aim to bar companies like Uber and Lyft from becoming monopolistic in the area.

Administrators believe that these regulations are in the interest of public safety. Currently, Uber and Lyft use drivers' names and birthdates to process background checks. The Public Transportation Commission claims that adding fingerprints would help detect criminal backgrounds and keep predators and dangerous drivers off the roads and away from potential victims. Uber and Lyft have customarily argued that fingerprint background checks have a disproportionate impact on minorities. The companies contend that such background checks also aren't entirely fair because they often detect arrest histories rather than just returning conviction histories.

Uber has promised to leave the Tampa Bay area if these new regulations are imposed upon Hillsborough County ridesharing operations. Lyft has not provided a statement.

Residents who want to keep Uber and Lyft in the Tampa Bay area are fighting back against the Public Transportation Commission. There is currently a petition on Change.org urging local elected officials to "Save Uber & Lyft in Tampa!" The petition is directed toward the members of the PTC as well as Bob Buckhorn, the mayor of Tampa. The petition's author is encouraging officials to "stop feeding into special interests and ruining our access to ridesharing services in Hillsborough County." Currently, the petition has more than 800 signatures.

The petition doesn't mention fingerprint background checks, which have historically been a sticking point for Uber and Lyft. Rather, the petition takes issue with the minimum fare and minimum wait time regulations. "It's clear that you are not acting in a public safety role but rather attempting to 'level the playing field' for limo/taxi special interests," the petition's author accuses. The suggestion is that the PTC is forcing ridesharing companies to reduce the economical nature and overall quality of their services so that other transportation companies in the area can stay competitive.

The PTC's impending vote will determine the future of ridesharing services in the Tampa Bay area.

Sources:

http://www.bizjournals.com/tampabay/news/2016/09/08/uber-supporters-launch-petition-to-thwart.html

https://www.change.org/p/commissioner-david-pogorilich-save-uber-lyft-in-tampa


Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • June 20 Repeat background checks are becoming more common, with companies in India leading the charge. What does this trend look like, and how can employers embrace it now to stay ahead of the curve?
  • June 19

    Every federal job involves a background check of some kind. These background checks and how they are evaluated vary based on job, department, and security clearance level.


  • June 18

  • June 14 Ban the box laws aim to improve opportunities for employment. Could they have the opposite effect instead?
  • June 13 Jacobs Petroleum Products is a regional petroleum company that operates throughout Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Maryland. Apart from their employees carrying much responsibility and have frequent contact with customers, the company’s hiring also tends to be segmented since individual store managers are responsible for hiring talent for their own stores. In this employment landscape, Jacobs Petroleum Products needed a reliable and effective way to screen its new hires for criminal infractions and other red flags.
  • June 12

    The University of Wisconsin System may tweak its hiring and reference check processes. The potential changes come after one of UW’s assistant deans was accused of sexual harassment.


  • June 07 Stories of abuse by coaches in youth sports leagues continue to crop up around the country, but rules and guidelines remain patchy and enforcement is often lacking. The struggle to implement an effective system continues nationwide.
  • June 07 Financial background checks, usually referred to as credit history checks, can be an effective way to find out if a candidate is fit to handle accounts, financial data, and other assets at your business.
  • June 06 The Society for Human Resource Management and the Charles Koch Institute recently commissioned a survey to find out how willing employers were to hire people with criminal records. The study indicates that managers, HR professionals, and employees themselves are becoming more comfortable with the idea of hiring and working with ex-offenders.
  • June 04 Are fingerprint background checks the gold standard for employee screening, or are they overhyped? We look at some of the myths and misconceptions surrounding these checks.