Lansing Nonprofit Adds Background Checks for Volunteers

By Michael Klazema on 6/17/2016

A few weeks ago, we covered the story of the Listening Ear, a nonprofit organization in Lansing, Michigan that ended up in hot water after discovering that three of its volunteers were registered sex offenders. The Listening Ear—more officially known as the Listening Ear Crisis Intervention Center—is a crisis hotline that operates 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The nonprofit organization offers a "free and confidential service" for individuals who needs someone to talk to about depression, loneliness, grief, suicidal thoughts, or sexual assault.

Largely because of the Listening Ear's focus on sexual assault, the fact that three of the volunteers manning the phone lines were sex offenders ballooned into a major PR nightmare for the organization. The nonprofit assured callers and supporters that none of the sex offenders were responsible for taking calls about sexual assault. Still, that fact didn't stop the nearby Michigan State University from announcing that it would stop referring students to the Listening Ear hotline.

Now, the Listening Ear is opting to change its policies rather than continue to deal with bad PR. According to a report from Michigan Radio, the organization will start running background checks on volunteers immediately. The Listening Ear has been active since July 15, 1969, which means that it took almost 47 years for the nonprofit hotline to add background checks. As far as we know, though, there were never any incidents where the lack of volunteer screenings created a dangerous situation for a caller.

The Michigan Radio report quoted the Listening Ear's "media liaison," who said that the organization made a conscious choice not to require background checks in the past. She stated that the Listening Ear has always wanted to create "a judgment-free, non-discriminatory environment"—suggesting that vetting volunteers would conflict with that mission. After witnessing community backlash for this decision, however, the organization has now changed its tune.

"Effective immediately, all current and future volunteers are subject to background checks," said a statement posted on the Listening Ear's Facebook page. "No individual listed on the Sex Offender Registry is allowed to volunteer with us. As a result of this new policy, we have already begun running background checks on all volunteers, and the existing three volunteers who listed on the Sex Offender Registry have been removed from their positions as crisis line volunteers and are no longer with The Listening Ear."

The decision is about as good as the Listening Ear could have done regarding damage control. Luckily, the organization didn't have any significant consequences to contend with, despite the lack of background checks for volunteers. (Not all businesses or nonprofits that fail to run background checks on employees or volunteers are so lucky.) Still, this situation and the media coverage it received has tarnished the Listening Ear's reputation, and it might take awhile for the organization to rebuild its trust with the community. For instance, there is no word yet as to whether or not MSU will resume referrals for the Listening Ear hotline.


Industry News

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.