Blog

 
     

Lansing Nonprofit Adds Background Checks for Volunteers

By Michael Klazema on 6/17/2016

A few weeks ago, we covered the story of the Listening Ear, a nonprofit organization in Lansing, Michigan that ended up in hot water after discovering that three of its volunteers were registered sex offenders. The Listening Ear—more officially known as the Listening Ear Crisis Intervention Center—is a crisis hotline that operates 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The nonprofit organization offers a "free and confidential service" for individuals who needs someone to talk to about depression, loneliness, grief, suicidal thoughts, or sexual assault.

Largely because of the Listening Ear's focus on sexual assault, the fact that three of the volunteers manning the phone lines were sex offenders ballooned into a major PR nightmare for the organization. The nonprofit assured callers and supporters that none of the sex offenders were responsible for taking calls about sexual assault. Still, that fact didn't stop the nearby Michigan State University from announcing that it would stop referring students to the Listening Ear hotline.

Now, the Listening Ear is opting to change its policies rather than continue to deal with bad PR. According to a report from Michigan Radio, the organization will start running background checks on volunteers immediately. The Listening Ear has been active since July 15, 1969, which means that it took almost 47 years for the nonprofit hotline to add background checks. As far as we know, though, there were never any incidents where the lack of volunteer screenings created a dangerous situation for a caller.

The Michigan Radio report quoted the Listening Ear's "media liaison," who said that the organization made a conscious choice not to require background checks in the past. She stated that the Listening Ear has always wanted to create "a judgment-free, non-discriminatory environment"—suggesting that vetting volunteers would conflict with that mission. After witnessing community backlash for this decision, however, the organization has now changed its tune.

"Effective immediately, all current and future volunteers are subject to background checks," said a statement posted on the Listening Ear's Facebook page. "No individual listed on the Sex Offender Registry is allowed to volunteer with us. As a result of this new policy, we have already begun running background checks on all volunteers, and the existing three volunteers who listed on the Sex Offender Registry have been removed from their positions as crisis line volunteers and are no longer with The Listening Ear."

The decision is about as good as the Listening Ear could have done regarding damage control. Luckily, the organization didn't have any significant consequences to contend with, despite the lack of background checks for volunteers. (Not all businesses or nonprofits that fail to run background checks on employees or volunteers are so lucky.) Still, this situation and the media coverage it received has tarnished the Listening Ear's reputation, and it might take awhile for the organization to rebuild its trust with the community. For instance, there is no word yet as to whether or not MSU will resume referrals for the Listening Ear hotline.

Sources: http://michiganradio.org/post/listening-ear-will-begin-doing-background-checks-its-volunteers#stream/0

http://www.wilx.com/content/news/Listening-Ear-Votes-YES-to-background-checks-NO-sex-offenders-can-volunteer-381919821.html

http://theear.org/newear/

Industry News

Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • June 20 Repeat background checks are becoming more common, with companies in India leading the charge. What does this trend look like, and how can employers embrace it now to stay ahead of the curve?
  • June 19

    Every federal job involves a background check of some kind. These background checks and how they are evaluated vary based on job, department, and security clearance level.


  • June 18

  • June 14 Ban the box laws aim to improve opportunities for employment. Could they have the opposite effect instead?
  • June 13 Jacobs Petroleum Products is a regional petroleum company that operates throughout Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Maryland. Apart from their employees carrying much responsibility and have frequent contact with customers, the company’s hiring also tends to be segmented since individual store managers are responsible for hiring talent for their own stores. In this employment landscape, Jacobs Petroleum Products needed a reliable and effective way to screen its new hires for criminal infractions and other red flags.
  • June 12

    The University of Wisconsin System may tweak its hiring and reference check processes. The potential changes come after one of UW’s assistant deans was accused of sexual harassment.


  • June 07 Stories of abuse by coaches in youth sports leagues continue to crop up around the country, but rules and guidelines remain patchy and enforcement is often lacking. The struggle to implement an effective system continues nationwide.
  • June 07 Financial background checks, usually referred to as credit history checks, can be an effective way to find out if a candidate is fit to handle accounts, financial data, and other assets at your business.
  • June 06 The Society for Human Resource Management and the Charles Koch Institute recently commissioned a survey to find out how willing employers were to hire people with criminal records. The study indicates that managers, HR professionals, and employees themselves are becoming more comfortable with the idea of hiring and working with ex-offenders.
  • June 04 Are fingerprint background checks the gold standard for employee screening, or are they overhyped? We look at some of the myths and misconceptions surrounding these checks.