Blog

 
     

Former Youth Sports Umpire Sentenced for Failing to Register as a Sex Offender

By Michael Klazema on 4/3/2017

A 51-year-old Illinois man has been sentenced to prison for failing to register as a sex offender. Per a report from the Belleville News-Democrat, Dennis Cotton served as a youth sports umpire and referee for Smithton School District for about a year. A police investigation uncovered a sexual offense in Cotton’s past. The offense took place in Arizona in 2003 and required him to register as a sex offender—a step he never took.

Per coverage, Cotton has been sentenced to three years in prison for failing to register as a sex offender. Cotton’s actions mean that when he gets out of prison, he must register as a sex offender again and remain on sex offender registries for the rest of his life.

Since Cotton was not on the sex offender registry, the Illinois High School Association—the body that maintains a database of active high school athletics in the state—did not realize his status, reports explain. Neither did Smithton School District, which hired Cotton without checking the IHSA registry: Cotton’s IHSA license had lapsed when the school hired him. The district claims that it assumed Cotton was not on the sex offender registry because he had been a part of the IHSA database.

While there are no allegations of harm to students during Cotton’s time as a Smithton youth sports referee, his hiring did raise questions about background checks at the state level, coverage notes. Pending legislation would require the IHSA to conduct fingerprint background checks of all sporting officials. Per school administrators, the hope is that more thorough checks will help to spot serious sex offenses and other criminal issues even for applicants who have neglected to register as offenders.

While the new legislation is pending, school district officials in Smithton have adopted measures they claim will ensure that athletic officials are safe and trustworthy. As reports explain, the district is conducting its own state criminal and sex offender background checks, even on referees and umpires who are part of the IHSA database. In-state background checks would not have prevented Cotton from being hired in the first place because his prior offense took place in Arizona.

Sources: http://www.bnd.com/news/local/article141049758.html


Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • April 19

    In a post-Penn State scandal world, universities are more aware than ever of the need to protect students by vetting faculty. The extent of this vetting and its implementation are hot topics causing controversy on campuses nationwide.


  • April 18 Amazon’s criminal background checks look back seven years and consider any convictions from that time. All finalists must complete criminal background searches, reference checks, and drug tests.
  • April 17

    From entry-level positions to roles involving “Top Secret” security clearances, military roles can involve a variety of different background investigations. We look at what different types of military background checks entail.


  • April 17 A new CNBC series is looking at true HR stories and their lessons. The most recent installment looked at the consequences of not running background checks.
  • April 12 Complicated by patchwork legislation and continuing federal prohibition, marijuana legalization poses several challenges for employers and would-be employees alike. Despite its legal status in a growing number of states, marijuana continues to negatively impact job-seekers.
  • April 12 Familiarizing yourself with the legality of background checks is essential. Continue reading about laws and regulations.
  • April 11

    Understanding the background check obligations in your industry and state.

  • April 10 A former employee of a senior assisted living community is facing charges for stealing from a resident. The alleged theft occurred after the employee gained access to the patient’s credit cards and checking account.
  • April 06 Background checks aren’t pass or fail. Employers consider various factors before making any hiring decision based on background check data.
  • April 06  Level 1 and Level 2 are terms used in Florida law to describe background check requirements for employers. We look at what a Level 2 background check entails.